It is in present tense, however there might be a difference depending on what the entire verb string is. She is. -present tense She is supposed... -present tense, passive voice In the second example 'supposed' is the past participle of 'suppose'.
The past tense of suppose is supposed.
The expression "suppose to" isn't correct. It should be "supposed to"
Am, is, and are are present tense forms of be. The past tense forms of be are was and were. The future tense of be is will be.
Past tense I had Present tense I have Future Tense I will have
The past tense of did is did. The present tense of did is do. The future tense of did is will do.
The past tense of suppose is supposed.
Yes. It's the past tense of suppose.
Present tense - I/you/we/they suppose. He/she/it supposes. Past tense - Supposed. Future tense - Will suppose.
supposed
No. Aftermath is supposed to be future-tense. Though in just about all contexts it's used in, it's used as present-tense.
No, the past tense of regular verbs ends in -ed.
The expression "suppose to" isn't correct. It should be "supposed to"
Yes, if the sentence is supposed to be in present tense.
Past tense of crew is crewed.
N0. Came is the past tense of to come. It is a verb. eg He was supposed to come today but he cameyesterday instead.
No. Movies like novels are written in past present or future or a mixture of all.
It depends on whether the sentence is supposed to be in the present or past tense. If it's the past tense -- if your grandfather is no longer your fishing buddy because he died or because you two got in a huge fight -- then you use "had." If he still IS your fishing buddy and advisor -- if it's the present tense -- then you use "has."