Present tense.
'Would' implies a sort-of hypothetical; something like an 'if; then' statement. For example, "If I didn't have any money, what would I do?" So 'would it be' can work as future tense or as present tense, as long as there is something like a hypothetical in the statement being made. For example, "Would it be fine with you if I went to the shops tomorrow?" is a sort-of hypothetical future tense statement, while "Would it be fine with you if I was jumping now?" is a sort-of hypothetical present tense statement. It can work as future tense, but not quite as most future tense things do, so I'd need to know the sentence it's in to answer for sure.
The statement "I agree with you" is correct. "Am" is not needed in this context because "agree" already indicates the present tense.
The sentence is grammatically incorrect. It should be sang and not sing because it is past tense.
The verb tense of the statement "will be completed by a certain time to come" is future progressive passive. It indicates an action that will be ongoing in the future, and it emphasizes that the action will be carried out and completed by a specific time in the future.
'Did' is used as the past tense of the auxiliary verb 'do' to form questions and negative statements in the past tense. It is also used for emphasis or to contrast with a negative statement. For example, "Did you finish your homework?" or "I did not see him yesterday."
'Would' implies a sort-of hypothetical; something like an 'if; then' statement. For example, "If I didn't have any money, what would I do?" So 'would it be' can work as future tense or as present tense, as long as there is something like a hypothetical in the statement being made. For example, "Would it be fine with you if I went to the shops tomorrow?" is a sort-of hypothetical future tense statement, while "Would it be fine with you if I was jumping now?" is a sort-of hypothetical present tense statement. It can work as future tense, but not quite as most future tense things do, so I'd need to know the sentence it's in to answer for sure.
The statement "I agree with you" is correct. "Am" is not needed in this context because "agree" already indicates the present tense.
The correct phrase is 'Had tried. The word 'had' represents a past-tense statement.
In present tense, you can write "We go camping every summer." This maintains the habitual aspect of the original statement while using the present tense form of the verb "to go."
The sentence is grammatically incorrect. It should be sang and not sing because it is past tense.
The verb tense of the statement "will be completed by a certain time to come" is future progressive passive. It indicates an action that will be ongoing in the future, and it emphasizes that the action will be carried out and completed by a specific time in the future.
'Did' is used as the past tense of the auxiliary verb 'do' to form questions and negative statements in the past tense. It is also used for emphasis or to contrast with a negative statement. For example, "Did you finish your homework?" or "I did not see him yesterday."
State, as in "to state something" is the verb of statement.Other verbs depending on the tense are states, stating and stated.
you have to use your hypothesis and use the "if" to put it in future tense and the if is the wat ifff something happend of your hhypothesis
It appears to be using the subjunctive mood rather than the present tense (When it is older...). The dog is not currently older, a counterfactual condition. The statement itself is an opinion, not a fact. All these point to the subjunctive mood rather than the present tense.
The word contradict is a verb. The past tense is contradicted.
Subjunctive, basically because the first clause is a "want" and then after is que.