.l.
The three main dichotomies of linguistics are: synchrony vs. diachrony (study of language at a specific point in time vs. over time), competence vs. performance (knowledge of language vs. its use in context), and langue vs. parole (language system vs. actual instances of language use).
Use "into" to indicate movement from outside to inside a place or to express transformation. Use "in to" when "in" is part of an infinitive verb phrase or when "to" is a preposition indicating movement towards a specific point or goal. For example, "She walked into the room" vs. "She decided to walk in to see her friend."
Use "I" when it is the subject of a verb. At all other times, use "me."
Use "is" if the subject of the sentence is singular; use "are" if plural. "The fact that I ate after running *is* irrelevant. ("after running" is the prepositional phrase; "the fact" is the subject). The methods prisoners use to escape *are* manifold. ("to escape" is the prepositional phrase; "The methods" is the subject).
No, the phrase "had went" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "had gone," using the past participle of "go" after the auxiliary verb "had."
Versus
clause because it simply has a subject and predicate
There are no negatives in the phrase "father and us".
The phrase dog vs cat isn't common but it would mean that they are fighting or battling. However, raining cats and dogs means that it is raining heavily.
Marvel
Try this https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal. I'm not sure if this is exact. make sure you use "exact" vs Broad to get a better idea of the exact phrase or word
7 colours in the visible spectrum
That is not a phrase
you use this phrase when giving something to someone
The second word in the phrase marvel vs capcom is marvel, mar is the first word
The scheduled fight was Giovanni vs. Cartel.
you use the brears by going on how to play smackdown vs raw.