Both are correct forms. They do not mean the same thing.
Both are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "It is broken" is present tense, indicating that something is currently not functioning properly. "It was broken" is past tense, indicating that something was not functioning properly in the past.
Sat - ur - day is the correct syllabification of Saturday.
The answer is SIEZE. Remember the rule of English, 'i' before 'e' except after 'c'. But also remember rules were made to be broken. Saul Bellow wrote "Seize the Day".
"broken" already is the past participle of "break".
By whom has the glass been broken?
Both are correct, but "Was the camera broken?" is more common and sounds more normal then "Had the camera broken?"
"It is broken." Broken is an adjective. Broke is a verb, the past tense of to break.
The past participle of "break" is "broken." When it is used with "have" or "had," the correct forms are "have broken" and "had broken," respectively.
No it should really be "will have broken"
Both are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "It is broken" is present tense, indicating that something is currently not functioning properly. "It was broken" is past tense, indicating that something was not functioning properly in the past.
Since 'hoped' is past tense, the correct rendition would be "You hoped that the speaker of your iPhone was just broken."
Twice a day.
No that is not the correct language. It would be better to say: How did your wrist watch get broken.
yes
No, the modifier "lying in pieces on the floor" does not correctly modify the subject "the broken vase was irreparable." This modifier suggests that the broken vase, not the vase itself, is lying on the floor. To correct this, you could say "The broken vase, lying in pieces on the floor, was irreparable."
No ! In America we speak broken English according to the the people in England.
No, the correct word is "have".The three girls might have broken the records.