"Jason is thinking about studying law or maybe he will pursue a career in finance." This sentence is an example of faulty coordination because it combines two independent clauses using the coordinating conjunction "or" without a proper structure.
example of interrogative sentence
Yes, there should be a comma after "for example" when it is used to introduce an example in a sentence. This helps to separate the example from the rest of the sentence for clarity and to indicate a pause.
The word "run" is a verb. Example sentence: She runs in the park every morning.
An example of an interrogative sentence is one that asks a question. How do you like school? That is an example.
"Are you coming to the party?" is an example of an interrogative sentence. It is a sentence that asks a question and typically ends with a question mark.
An example of faulty subject-verb agreement is: "The team of researchers are conducting experiments." In this sentence, the subject "team" is a collective noun and should be treated as singular, so it should read, "The team of researchers is conducting experiments." This illustrates the importance of ensuring that the verb agrees with the singular or plural form of the subject.
Parallelism means each half or part of a sentence needs balanced by the other part. Faulty parallelism means the sentence is not balanced. I wanted to work, but she did not. (did not what?)
faulty predication occurs when the subject of a sentence can't "do" the verb. Here is an example: The temperature of water boils at 212 degrees. Water boild at 212 but the temperature can't boil.
The television you sold me is faulty.The faulty wiring was replaced.
To provide an effective revision, I would need the original sentence that contains the faulty parallelism. Please share the specific sentence, and I can suggest a correction!
No . Grammar is faulty.
To accurately identify the type of faulty logic in the sentence, I would need to see the specific sentence you're referring to. Please provide the sentence, and I'll help analyze the logical fallacy it contains!
There is no faulty pronoun in the example sentence. The only pronoun 'its' is used correctly as a possessive adjective to describe the noun 'recommendation'. The pronoun 'it' matches the noun antecedent 'task force' in number (singular) and gender (neuter). A task force is an abstract noun, a word for a concept; concepts have no gender.
To correct faulty parallelism, ensure that elements in a list or series maintain the same grammatical structure. For example, if you start with a verb in one part of the list, all items should also begin with a verb. Review the sentence to align phrases or clauses consistently, enhancing clarity and readability. Finally, revise the sentence to reflect this uniformity.
Its not a statement of faulty logic because it is a question not a statement, also its not comparing anything so that is why i think its not a faulty statement
There is no faulty pronoun in the sentence. There is no pronoun in the sentence. In this sentence, the word 'their' is an adjective; the pronoun form of the word is 'theirs'. Using the pronoun, the sentence would read: The task force submitted theirs a week early. The pronoun 'theirs' replaces the word 'recommendation'.
An example sentence is a sentence written to show usage of a particular word or phrase. This sentence is an example of an example sentence!