to seperate a sentence
Sure, I can use a conjunction like 'while' or 'although' to introduce an adverbial clause that provides additional information about an action or situation. Let me know if you would like me to demonstrate it with an example sentence.
"Had" is the past tense of the verb "to have". It is not a conjunction. An example of a conjunction would be the word 'and'.
You should use a comma before the conjunction in a compound sentence. For example, "I like apples, and she likes oranges."
As contrasted with the use of "for" as a preposition (intended use or recipient), the conjunction "for" means something different. As a coordinating conjunction, it generally means the same thing as the subordinating conjunctions "because" or "since" (He had to quit the company, for his father no longer supported him). The conjunction "as" may be used in the same context.
You would use a comma after a conjunction when the sentence structure calls for it. For example: "Tell me what the weather will be tomorrow and, if good, whether you want to go to the park." The conjunction is "and" but the phrase "if good" is conditional and must be separated by commas. == True, you use a comma after a conjunction when the sentence structure calls for it. To explain the example given above, the comma after if good denotes the separation of an introductory prepositional phrase. The sentence itself is awkward, and conversational--not really proper written English. It works though. Generally, a comma follows a conjunction in the event a conjuntive adverb is used. Like so: I want to go to the movies; however, I have other work to do first.Any time you use a transitional word like however in the manner in this example, it is a conjunctive adverb. Think of it this way: if the sentence can be made into two complete sentences, but you want to join them, do so with a conjunctive adverb. End the first clause with a semicolon, insert the CV, follow that with a comma, and drive on.
When can you use than as a preposition rather than a conjunction?
A conjunction does not normally form a plural, but can be referenced as the use of a conjunction, and would be "ands."Examples :How many ands are in the Declaration?That is the decision, and there are no ifs, ands, or buts. (idiom)
No. The archaic idiomatic conjunction "would that" (if only, as a wish) is formed by the verb would (conditional of will) and the conjunction that.
Yes, AND is arguably the most common coordinating conjunction. It is followed in instances of use by the subordinating conjunction THAT.
At is a preposition. And is a conjunction.
Boyset >,<
The word again cannot be used alone as a conjunction. It is an adverb.
NO, you would have to use "but"
A semicolon would be the appropriate punctuation connecting two independent clauses IF there is no coordinating conjunction; However, if there IS a coordinating conjunction (and, but...) then you would only use a comma to separate both independent clauses
no
Sure, I can use a conjunction like 'while' or 'although' to introduce an adverbial clause that provides additional information about an action or situation. Let me know if you would like me to demonstrate it with an example sentence.
no a comma is not needed behind every conjunction. like the word and or or. For Example: Would u like cake AND lemonade OR hambugers AND hotdogs. hop this helped:) -alessandra