firstly koalas are not bears. Their main diet are the leaves of eucalyptus trees so unless eucalyptus trees are abundant then the answer would be no. But a small number kept in a zoo with enough of their favourite food would survive.
None at all. The koala is not a bear; nor does it live in Africa; nor can it survive in grasslands.See the related question for what adaptations a koala has.
No. Koalas, which are not related to bears, are marsupials which are native to Australia alone. Koalas could not survive the cold climate of Alaska.
Usually all the time
Koalas already have everything the need to survive. They are equipped with numerous adaptations that enable them to survive, and tribe, in their habitat. Refer to the related question below for these adaptations.However, few animals as able to survive man's interference in their environment. The koala is no exception. If man continues to degrade the koala's environment, koalas are unlikely to survive.
yes
You could call a koala webkinz sleepy or snorty.
Because Muskoxen can survive in the Arctic regions of Canada, Greenland and Alaska and providing there is grass, herbs and lichens to eat, maybe the Yak could survive
the have 2 thumbs and 3 fingers to climb trees
No. Koalas need eucalyptus trees to survive, as they rely on eucalyptus trees for both food and shelter. These trees form the koala's bushland habitat, or ecosystem.
Given that it is illegal to hunt or kill a koala, there is no one in the modern world who could tell you.
No. You could most certainly not take a koala to Miami. They are protected native animals, and are not even permitted to be kept as pets in Australia.
no living things can survive without water for ever