0
To determine whether the results support or contradict a hypothesis about giraffes, one would need to specify the hypothesis in question. For instance, if the hypothesis posits that giraffes have evolved long necks primarily to reach high foliage, and research shows they also use their necks for combat, the results could both support and contradict the initial hypothesis, suggesting a more complex evolutionary role for their necks. Ultimately, the interpretation hinges on the specific aims and findings of the research conducted.
What else can I help you with?
What if the results do not support the hypothesis you were testing?
Then explain why it was wrong
Should flemings hypothesis be supported or rejected based on the experiment?
To determine whether Fleming's hypothesis should be supported or rejected based on an experiment, one would need to analyze the results of the experiment in relation to the hypothesis. If the data from the experiment aligns with the predictions made by Fleming's hypothesis, then it should be supported. However, if the results contradict the hypothesis, it may need to be rejected or revised.
Did the result of the experiment support or reject the hypothesis?
To determine whether the experiment supported or rejected the hypothesis, it is essential to analyze the data collected during the experiment. If the results align with the predictions made by the hypothesis, then it can be considered supported. Conversely, if the results contradict these predictions, the hypothesis would be rejected. A detailed examination of the evidence is necessary for a definitive conclusion.
What are different scientific methods and explain?
observation hypothesis experiments result further hypothesis further experiments results and theory
Is a hypothesis is a decision based on the results of the experiment.?
No. An hypothesis is an idea put forward to explain an observation. Often you do the experiment to test the hypothesis. The results of the experiment may help you decide whether to discard your hypothesis or to test it further.
Why is it important to report experimental results honestly even when the results go against your hypothesis?
Reporting experimental results honestly, even if they contradict your hypothesis, is crucial for the integrity of scientific research. It allows for transparency, reproducibility, and accuracy in the scientific community. By reporting all results, regardless of whether they support the hypothesis, it helps prevent bias and ensures that knowledge is advanced based on sound evidence.
What is either supported or unsupported by the results for an investigation?
Results from an investigation can either support or contradict a hypothesis based on the evidence gathered. When the findings align with the initial predictions, they provide support, indicating that the hypothesis may be valid. Conversely, if the results are inconsistent with the hypothesis, they suggest that it may be unsupported or require reevaluation. Ultimately, the interpretation of results helps inform future research directions and understanding of the studied phenomenon.
What is a summary that explains whether the data support the hypothesis?
To determine if the data support the hypothesis, one must analyze the findings in relation to the predicted outcomes. If the results consistently align with the hypothesis and demonstrate statistically significant correlations or differences, then the data can be considered supportive. Conversely, if the results contradict the hypothesis or show no significant relationship, the data would not support the hypothesis. In summary, the support hinges on the alignment of the data with the expected predictions of the hypothesis.
Is a hypothesis is always correct?
No, a hypothesis is not always correct. It is an educated guess or prediction that can be tested through experimentation and observation. The results may support the hypothesis, contradict it, or lead to further questions, but the initial hypothesis itself is not guaranteed to be true. It serves as a starting point for scientific inquiry rather than a definitive answer.
What are the steps to scientific inqury?
problem, hypothesis, materials, procedures, observations/results, conclusion. explain
In the conclusion of an experiment can you leave out experimental results that do not support your hypothesis?
No, it is not appropriate to leave out experimental results that do not support your hypothesis in the conclusion of an experiment. Transparent reporting of all results, whether they support or contradict the hypothesis, is essential for scientific integrity and the advancement of knowledge. Including negative or inconclusive results can provide valuable insights and help refine future research. Furthermore, cherry-picking data undermines the validity of the study and can mislead other researchers.
Which hypothesis most likely explain the results at C and C?
Enzymes never work at higher temperatures
