Then explain why it was wrong
To determine whether Fleming's hypothesis should be supported or rejected based on an experiment, one would need to analyze the results of the experiment in relation to the hypothesis. If the data from the experiment aligns with the predictions made by Fleming's hypothesis, then it should be supported. However, if the results contradict the hypothesis, it may need to be rejected or revised.
observation hypothesis experiments result further hypothesis further experiments results and theory
No. An hypothesis is an idea put forward to explain an observation. Often you do the experiment to test the hypothesis. The results of the experiment may help you decide whether to discard your hypothesis or to test it further.
Reporting experimental results honestly, even if they contradict your hypothesis, is crucial for the integrity of scientific research. It allows for transparency, reproducibility, and accuracy in the scientific community. By reporting all results, regardless of whether they support the hypothesis, it helps prevent bias and ensures that knowledge is advanced based on sound evidence.
Results from an investigation can either support or contradict a hypothesis based on the evidence gathered. When the findings align with the initial predictions, they provide support, indicating that the hypothesis may be valid. Conversely, if the results are inconsistent with the hypothesis, they suggest that it may be unsupported or require reevaluation. Ultimately, the interpretation of results helps inform future research directions and understanding of the studied phenomenon.
problem, hypothesis, materials, procedures, observations/results, conclusion. explain
By testing your results, and explain in your conclusion what went wrong
Enzymes never work at higher temperatures
The scientific method is a step-by-step process used to explore a scientific query or hypothesis. # Ask a question # Do research # Form a hypothesis # Test the hypothesis through experimentation # Analyze results and develop a conclusion # Communicate results to peers # Peer analysis
It depends a great deal on the specific experiment. But in general, you start with a hypothesis (a proposed idea) and use the experiment to either confirm or contradict your hypothesis. Having a well-stated and clear hypothesis is critical to having a good experiment. Alternatively, you can use an experiment to answer a specific question. Once you have a hypothesis or question to address, you need to establish a method by which you will answer the question. It is important to not only consider the technique itself and how to do it, but also how to interpret different possible results. Once you have performed the experiment, you must interpret your results (usually using the interpretation mentioned above). You must also consider other factors in your results, such as error (either random or systematic). Finally, do the results support or contradict the original hypothesis, or do they answer the question originally asked? If not, what is missing? If so, what does that mean (in other words, why was the hypothesis interesting or important to test in the first place?
it has to have purpose , hypothesis , research , title , display , pictures, explain results, conclusion and disscussion.