Do Dogs have better vision then cats?

Answer 1

yes a dog does have a better memory than a cat because have youever noticed that a dog does many tricks and they have to memorize them. hve you noticed that cats are just always roaming around with no destination so they must not remember. if you ask me i think my assertion is correct because of the scientific reason that most dogs are very samrt and if you look it up.

+++

A cat lover might say the cat is brighter because it refuses to learn silly tricks that merely amuse those strange two-legged creatures with whom it shares a home! :-)

Answer 2

Actually,it depends on which sense.this is what im doing my science project on and so far these are the results:

• Hearing: A cat has better hearing than a dog
• Sight: A cat is also better than a dog on sighting because cats and dogs can both see in the day but when its dark, cats have better lenses than a dog
• Smell: A dog can smell better than a cat
• Taste: A cat has a better tasting ability because it can taste and see if a meat or other material is raw or rotten
• Touch: A dog has a better sense of touch are able to feel their pry or hunt without their eyesight because they can feel their surroundings

as a 11 year old student going to a elementary school i am proud to give this information to all browsers who need it:).

+++

I am very sorry to disappoint you but you fallen into a common trap of comparing animals senses on a "better than" basis. None of your list is any "better" than the rest. The mistake misses the point that each species - including our own as a primate mammal - has its senses tuned to its natural way of life. The cat has more sensitive night-sight than the dog, you tell us, and indeed than us: but is its daylight sight any more sensitive to both colour and fine details (acuity) than that of dogs and humans?

'

"A dog can smell better than a cat". LOL! We know what you mean but if you've ever been close to a wet Labrador or a cat with bad breath... Yes, Fido may have a more sensitive sense of smell than that of Felix, but does that mean it is "better"? Of course not!

.

What you need to do is stop comparing your specimen animals by relative abilities, and find out what each species can actually see, hear etc. on its own merits, then determine how its senses fits it for its own way of life - and why.

.

That is a far more scientific approach than saying things like "X can hear higher frequencies than Y so its hearing is better than Y's". X and Y can both hear perfectly well thank you very much for what they have to do to live in the way they do. Good Luck!

Answer 3

That typically can't be answered without specifics, the individual senses and animal type need to be played in account for, Take a snake for example, it's hearing is only capable of really hearing very low vibrations, while it's taste is incredible , same concept goes for Canines sight, to it's sense of smell. I believe on a wider spectrum, speaking on a range, that animals generally have a better capabality of maximized senses, but we have answers.com :)

Answer 4

No.

In general its worse.