Often wombats do not survive if they are under attack, and this is why the Northern Hairy nosed wombat is endangered. Wombats in the immediate vicinity of their burrows stand a better chance of surviving an attack. Their burrow is only the size of their own body. They can then turn their heavy body and present only their back end, which is reinforced with extra thick skin and fur, to a would-be attacker. They have no tail for a predator to grasp onto. If an attacker is somehow able to climb over the top of the wombat while in its burrow, the marsupial has incredibly strong forelegs, with which it will push against the roof of its burrow, crushing the enemy.
Wombats are terrestrial animals. They cannot survive in water, though they can swim if they need to.
Small plants rarely survive a bushfire.
because it is a bushfire
they cant survive in a bushfire the are too small
There are no wombats in Africa. Wombats are native to Australia alone.
No, there are no wombats in Africa. Wombats are native to Australia alone.
Australians are not wombats. Wombats are marsupials. Australians are humans, which are placental mammals.
No. Wombats are not related to rats at all. Wombats are not rodents, but marsupials.
Baby wombats live in their mother's pouch. Wombats are marsupials.
It depends on what, exactly, is meant by the question. No animal that is caught in a bushfire can survive it. However, there are some Australian animals that can burrow sufficiently deep enough to stay safe. The short-beaked echidna, for example, can burrow up to a metre deep and survive in areas of low oxygen until a bushfire has passed. bilbies and burrowing bettongs have been known to survive bushfires as well. Platypuses dig burrows deep in riverbanks where they will shelter during bushfires: they do not stay in the water.
No animal from the rainforest eats wombats, as wombats do not live in the rainforest.
no wombats are Australian ONLY no wombats are Australian ONLY