If the number of tigers drop, then the number of (for example) Gazelles would increase because they are not being eaten by tigers. However, since there are more gazelles eating the same amount of grass, then there would be less grass, causing some gazelles to starve. The reduction of grass would also cause the top soil to dry out which would affect the worms. Which could possibly change the birds' diet. Which could affect the number of eggs they lay. Which could affect the number of eggs people eat. And on and on.
If the number of second-level consumers increases, it can lead to heightened competition for food resources among these consumers, potentially depleting the populations of first-level consumers (herbivores). This decline can disrupt the balance of the food chain, possibly resulting in a decrease in plant populations due to reduced herbivore activity. Additionally, if second-level consumers overpopulate, they may face starvation or decline due to insufficient food supply, which can create a cyclical effect impacting all levels of the food chain.
deersantelopesgazellehumanspeacocks
Only mankind. Tigers are the top of the food chain.
they are top carnivores, but the exact number depends on the other consumers in the chain. they're the last one.
apex predator,top of the chain.sabertooths were NOT tigers.
If the number of tigers increases then the food chain would be effected. Their prey (like birds, deers and other animals) would decrease and cause other food chains to be effected. Some people live in forests which may have tigers, the increase would cause more deaths in these communities.
i have no idea what you are talking about
Sadly, yes.
No. They are the top of the food chain.
We dont know! :(
Because the bees help to pollinate the crops. If no bee colonies exists then agricultural crops will decline significantly which in turn affects the whole food chain.
tigers eat hot mammas