Emily most clearly shows the technique of active listening in this conversation. She demonstrates this by paraphrasing and summarizing what others are saying, showing interest through body language, and asking open-ended questions to encourage further discussion.
Challenging the credibility of sources
Using evidence to support opinions
Asking clarifying questions -apex (:
Challenging established ideas
Synthesizing claims into a single conclusion
Ramona seems to be employing the technique of seeking clarification by asking for specific details or examples from Fiorini's book to support the facts mentioned. This technique encourages deeper understanding and encourages critical thinking within the group discussion.
Ramona is using the technique of reflecting on content by acknowledging a point made by another group member (Fiorini's book being gathered from facts) and adding her perspective (lack of trust in Fiorini's claims). This technique encourages dialogue and deeper exploration of ideas within the group discussion.
personification
The result of the minister's visit in "A Rose for Emily" can be considered ambiguous because the exact nature of the conversation between Emily and the minister is not revealed to the readers. It is left to interpretation whether the minister's visit had any impact on Emily's behavior or if it was merely a formality. This ambiguity adds to the mystery surrounding Emily's character and her motivations.
“What are the reasons you question the air Thor’s professionalisms?” APEX
I do not have access to personal information about individuals unless it has been shared with me in the course of our conversation. Can I help with anything else?