No. A wolverine is much fiercer than a deer because a wolverine is the biggest and fiercest mammal ever.
Possibly. A doe deer, especially if it has a fawn or two to protect, can be quite fiercer than a buck deer on the rut. Even if the doe deer has no antlers, it can still seriously injure a wolf if the wolf gets too close to the doe deer.
He was afraid of the dog because it was a lot fiercer than his own one.
The correct form is "She is fiercer than you are." In English, the comparative form of the adjective "fierce" is "fiercer," which is used for one-syllable adjectives. While "more fierce" can be understood, it is less commonly used and generally considered less standard.
A deer scared of a wolverine
cougars bear, bobcat, coyote, eagle, wolverine - man cougars bear, bobcat, coyote, eagle, wolverine - man
A wolf and a wolverine are about the same size, as far as body mass is concerned, so they may have the same level of strength. Maybe a large wolf would be larger, and ultimately stronger, than a wolverine, but a wolverine is capable of hunting and taking down a deer by itself where a pack of wolves (of three or four) are often needed to bring down that same deer. Wolverines have as much power in their jaws as well to crack through bones, just like a wolf does, to get the marrow.
The wolverine is capable of bringing down prey 5 times its size. It scavenges upon killed deer, caribou and sheep. the wolverine's diet consists of small mammals like voles, squirrels, marmots, porcupines, lemmings, birds, and mice, also reindeer, roe deer, wild sheep, and elk.
Fiercer isn't actually a word.
No, a wolverine is biggger and stronger.
It is difficult to say which animal is fiercer.
It's likely, as they are known to take down deer or caribou by themselves.
The comparative degree of the adjective "fierce" is "fiercer." It is used to compare the intensity of fierceness between two subjects. For example, you might say, "The lion is fiercer than the tiger."