Criteria for Judging Short Stories
By Steven Wilkens, eHow Contributor
updated January 27, 2011
Writers consider short stories a rewarding way to practice their craft.
Scholars trace the origin of the written short story to Egypt in about 3,000 B.C., and even further back if oral tales are taken into account. Modern short stories are works of prose fiction that are shorter than novels and novellas. Several basic criteria are used in judging short stories.
Judges of short stories examine the technical aspects of the story, an elementary but significant step of the judging process. Technical aspects include spelling, grammar, sentence structure, punctuation and mechanics such as the proper use of capitalization, italics and abbreviations. In formal contests of short story writing, judges make sure that entrants do not exceed the maximum number of words. Most definitions of short stories place the maximum allowable number of words at 7,000 to 10,000, although some contests limit stories to as few as 2,000 to 4,000 words.
Short story judges consider how much imagination and creativity the author used in writing the short story. They look at how original a short story is, or how much it stands out, grabs the reader's attention and presents new ideas compared to previously published short stories. An original, creative short story is one that reflects the author's style and vision in a vivid manner. Even if a new short story author is inspired by an established writer, he should still put his own original touches on his stories.
Judges examining the plot and themes presented in a short story consider factors such as whether the plot is convincing and how much it draws the reader into the story's world. Judges also ask themselves whether they find the story suspenseful, compelling, thrilling or emotionally moving, depending on its themes. Short stories have smaller casts of characters than most novels, but the author should still make the characters and their thoughts and actions come alive on the page.
Author Joyce Carol Oates has stated that one of the most significant parts in judging a short story is asking whether it achieves closure, which she defines as a situation in which when the story ends, the attentive reader understands why it is ending at that time. Even if a short story includes little in the way of traditional action, its ending should signal a change of some sort in the main character, a shift of consciousness or a deepening of insight.
Read more: Criteria for Judging Short Stories | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/info_7859512_criteria-judging-short-stories.html#ixzz1WhYnv5QI
what are the criteria in judging for a Speech Chooir Competion? what are the criteria in judging the speech choir competition?
criteria for judging on biukini open
criteria in judging dance contest
chorale criteria
When judging a retelling of a story, criteria generally include accuracy in conveying the original plot, clarity in communication, engaging storytelling techniques, and the ability to capture the essence or theme of the original story. Additionally, creativity in adding personal insights or interpretations can also be a factor.
Judging criteria: modeling, personality, beauty, grooming, and fashion sense.
chorale criteria
The most important criteria for judging a folk dance contest is a knowledge of folk dance. The next most important criteria for judging is a genuine love of Folk Dancing.
Creativity of the drawing and story. Originality and uniqueness of the idea. Overall presentation and delivery of the story. Attention to detail in both the drawing and storytelling.
The criteria for judging sportstwear depends with the kind of the sport and the climate. The gender of the athlete is the other criteria that is used.
Understood, I'll ensure to review the judging criteria thoroughly. Thank you for the reminder.
Criteria for judging an interpretive dance routine should include the difficulty of the routine and its execution. Other criteria to use may include technique and choreography.