probaly raw cuts of beef
probaly raw cuts of beef
There are no tigers in Australia (except in zoos), so it is unlikely a tiger and a kangaroo will ever meet.
Of course tigers have been seen at zoos. They are one of the star attractions
Yes, there are living Sumatran tigers. 85 in European zoos and 20 in Australian zoos.
Tigers live in the U.S of A northern area... only in zoos o'course though!
No, they do not.The main reason being because the platypus is native to Australia. And there are no tigers native to Australia.However if tigers were native to Australia, it is likely they would hunt and eat platypuses if they were very hungry. To a tiger, the platypus wouldn't be very filling, so they would prefer larger prey, like a kangaroo.
Zoos help people see animals that they otherwise wouldn't be able to be see. Some people are against them, but in general Tigers are amazing and beautiful and are definitely the kinds of animals that zoos are created to house. So yes, in my opinion, tigers should be in zoos.
bengal tigers are endangerd everywhere but not in zoos
It is estimated that there are around 200 white tigers in captivity worldwide, distributed in various zoos and wildlife facilities. However, the number of zoos specifically housing white tigers may vary and is difficult to determine accurately.
It has an Aquarium in Burlington, but no zoos that have tigers and elephants.
In zoos.
Ponies and meat