no, he did not believe that they were a direct threat, the closest thing is the 'global conspiracy'.
vegitation
a threat is when its a direct qoute and a warning is when theres something going to happen if they keep continuing the action
A Christian can indeed protect himself from a direct threat of harm!
Global warming is a direct threat to biodiversity because it can directly impact ecosystems through changes in temperature, precipitation patterns, and sea levels, which can result in habitat loss, shifts in species distributions, and increased extinction risks for many species.
Because they were another super power who military strengh parraleled their own.
dont start nothin dont be nothin
First Amendment rights are limited when a direct threat is posed either to an individual or to a group. It is a topic of controversy, since it is often difficult to tell what is a direct threat and what is simply a statement of opinion. In recent years, it has become a matter of national security according to some government officials, and the rights guaranteed under the first amendment have and most likely will continue to be pushed into the background when it is deemed "necessary."
Same as clear An "explicit" threat is a "clear" threat.
You technically can not charge them for mental abuse. You can only get them charged if a direct threat towards you can be proven.
Cold war, the spread of communism was a threat to the western word
Take direct action and conceal the disclosure immediately as it constitutes a critical threat that must be rectified