NO. they are not. They are called pandas because they look between a panda and a cat. But the panda did come after the red panda.
also red pandas are their OWN species pandas fall into the category of racoons which scientists just discovered. giant pandas are normal.
The Giant Panda is a bear, native to central-western and south western China.
Giant pandas belong to the bear (Ursidae) family
Red pandas and giant pandas are not alike. They are two different species of animal. Red pandas are related to raccoons whereas giant pandas are bears.
Yes, they are pandas. They are not considered a bear, though. They are more closely related to the raccoon and skunk. Red pandas where found before the Giant panda was.
The red panda is not closely related to any other animal. It was thought to be related to the bear or raccoon families but it is not. It is the only species of the genus Ailurus and the family Ailuridae.
They are called giant pandas to reduce confusion between giant pandas and red pandas. they are considerably large compared to red pandas therefore making them giant
red pandas and giant pandas
well wild giant pandas eat bamboo,honey,eggs,fish,yams,shrub leaves,bananas and oranges (im not kidding about the honey)
Actually, the red panda and the giant panda aren't related very closely. Scientists searched for a connection and they did find some. Red Pandas are actually closer related to things like skunks and small furry mammals.
There are Giant Pandas and Red Pandas.
No Red Pandas live in North America and Giant Pandas live in Japan or China
No, but they are related to kangaroos and wombats.