In areas where there are elk, they force the elk to move around and to be on guard. This is good for vegetation, because without the fear of being eaten, elk will ravish one area before moving on. If they destroy much of the vegetation in an area (specifically the deciduous trees), they eliminate shade needed by fish in streams, make food source harder to find for beavers, which, without their dams, disrupts other stream life. Fewer or no wolves means more deer. More deer means more problems with deer within human settlements. Fewer wolves mean more human run-ins with mountain lions, since they will have little reason not to come down from the high country.
In hunting they tend to kill the weaker and sick members of the herds they hunt; leaving the stronger ones alive giving them a better chance to live and breed
no because wolfes are so important to nature
Salt is a very important nutrient for animals especially cows; not so much wolves. Salt is important for main body functions and for homeostasis, among other things.
Wolves are NOT herbivores and do NOT eat any important amount of plants
every animale is important my friend
Why wouldn't "wolfs" be important?
Yes the Romans associated wolves with the sun god Apollo.
i belive so, dogs do as far as i know and wolves are canines too so mabe.
When wolves are together in a pack, they tend to do things the same, hunting sleeping etc. so they are always together that is why they are called a pack coz they are packed in, like chips is a packet.
yes both do. and wolves are so cool (:
Wolves are primarily carnivores - meat eaters - and do not eat leaves in any important amount.
because they thought that the wolves were hurting theirlivstock and they were afraid that the wolves would come after them.
Wolves in nature are at the top of the food chain. So no the only predators to wolves may be us.