it is that they thought they deserved it
They gain more land
in governing conquered people the persian were much more humane than the assyrians.
The Exodus I think... I hope this helps! :)
with pi
The Aztecs allowed some conquered peoples to govern themselves with relatively little interference as a strategy to maintain stability and reduce the likelihood of rebellion. By allowing local leaders to retain authority and manage day-to-day affairs, the Aztecs could extract tribute and resources more efficiently. This approach also fostered a degree of loyalty among the conquered populations, as they could preserve aspects of their own culture and governance. Ultimately, it helped the Aztec Empire to expand and maintain control over a vast and diverse territory.
That was the easy way, and prevented local uprisings.
They followed the successful example of their predecessors - Assyria and Babylon. By appointing provincial governors, they had a supervisory control to ensure that local government was run properly, and by having local government, the peoples were able to continue their traditional ways. And of course, it saved having massive bureaucracies which so plague the modern world, eg the European Union.
It is called religious freedom.
The Romans maintained the stability and strength of their empire by respecting the peoples they conquered. They tolerated their religions and customs and allowed them to continue to worship them. They also allowed them to continue to use their customary laws at the local level, which they called mos regionis (regional traditions/laws of the land). They relied on the local ruling elites to run local affairs in the provinces. This policy fostered political and social stability. It had two advantages: it facilitated the integration of the locals in the provinces (the conquered peoples) into the ideology and the economy of the empire and it reduced the administrative load (and the associated costs) of the provincial governors. It limited the job of the governors to defence and the maintenance of the legions stationed in the provinces, the commissioning of public works and arbitration of disputes the locals were unable to settle themselves. A less tolerant policy would have led to rebellions and would have threatened the stability of the empire. The conquered peoples also benefited form their participation in the thriving trading networks of the empire.
I think it was called" The underground railroad.
The aztecs wanted to be self sufficient and therefore allowed the local leaders to govern their own nation!
The Romans gained revenue either in coin or kind from the conquered peoples. The treatment the provincials received, however, depended upon the provincials themselves. Rebellious, warlike tribes, such as inhabited the area of Pannonia were treated roughly, while the people of Greece, Syria and Egypt were treated leniently and for the most part allowed to continue with their pre-Roman lifestyle and methods of gathering revenue.Besides gaining the benefits of revenue from taxation of conquered peoples, additional gains also were important. These benefits included the following which is a minor edit to the spirit of the answer.1. Access to the conquered peoples mining resources such as iron ore or minerals.2. Depending upon the nature of the conquered people, Rome gained a new pool of recruits for their legions.3. Access to agricultural products.4. Rome might also gain slaves which could be sold for a profit or used to work the mines and the agricultural resources.5. Roman wars and conquests of other nations had all the purposes and benefits listed above, however, on a geo-political level, the conquest was a benefit by eliminating any threat from the nation conquered and placing bordering nations one step further away from the center of the empire which was Rome.