answersLogoWhite

0

expand funding and opportunities for vocational training.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Management

Difference between human resource management and personnel management?

Some experts assert that there is no difference between human resources and personnel management. They state that the two terms can be used interchangeably, with no difference in meaning. In fact, the terms are often used interchangeably in help-wanted ads and job descriptions. For those who recognize a difference between personnel management and human resources, the difference can be described as philosophical. Personnel management is more administrative in nature, dealing with payroll, complying with employment law, and handling related tasks. Human resources, on the other hand, is responsible for managing a workforce as one of the primary resources that contributes to the success of an organization. When a difference between personnel management and human resources is recognized, human resources is described as much broader in scope than personnel management. Human resources is said to incorporate and develop personnel management tasks, while seeking to create and develop teams of workers for the benefit of the organization. A primary goal of human resources is to enable employees to work to a maximum level of efficiency. Personnel management can include administrative tasks that are both traditional and routine. It can be described as reactive, providing a response to demands and concerns as they are presented. By contrast, human resources involves ongoing strategies to manage and develop an organization's workforce. It is proactive, as it involves the continuous development of functions and policies for the purposes of improving a company's workforce. Personnel management is often considered an independent function of an organization. Human resource management, on the other hand, tends to be an integral part of overall company function. Personnel management is typically the sole responsibility of an organization's personnel department. With human resources, all of an organization's managers are often involved in some manner, and a chief goal may be to have managers of various departments develop the skills necessary to handle personnel related tasks. As far as motivators are concerned, personnel management typically seeks to motivate employees with such things as compensation, bonuses, rewards, and the simplification of work responsibilities. From the personnel management point of view, employee satisfaction provides the motivation necessary to improve job performance. The opposite is true of human resources. Human resource management holds that improved performance leads to employee satisfaction. With human resources, work groups, effective strategies for meeting challenges, and job creativity are seen as the primary motivators.


Why is ITIL the most widely accepted approach to IT service management in the world?

ITIL, or Information Technology Infrastructure Library, is the most widely accepted approach to IT service management for a few reasons. The ITIL is also one of the most wanted certifications in the IT field. It may help a company or enterprise, reduce total costs, improve professionalism and overall customer satisfaction.


What age did bill gates realize he wanted to start a business?

13 year


What is a sentence using the word management?

Bess wanted to manage the cat, but it just kept hissing!


Do you need a bachelor's degree to become a film producer?

probably idk this isn't what i wanted to do in life...but yea i would say yes

Related Questions

What were goals of the American progressives?

The Progressive Party wanted to reform American government. They wanted to improve working conditions, end child labor, and conserve Natural Resources.


What do most Americans want their new government to improve trade and to what?

Most Americans wanted their new government to improve trade and to help them.


Why do congress work in congress?

wanted to improve the government by making laws.


Why did the 13 colonies?

There were a few reasons why the 13 colonies began. They were not happy with their life in Europe. They wanted to improve their lives. They wanted more money, and they wanted to live where there were more Natural Resources.


Why did the 13 colonies happen?

There were a few reasons why the 13 colonies began. They were not happy with their life in Europe. They wanted to improve their lives. They wanted more money, and they wanted to live where there were more natural resources.


If a government wanted to expand its capital resources it could?

lower interest rates to make borrowing money easier.


How did the government want citizens to help in the war effort?

by saving needed recources.


What did john cobot want to do?

John Cobot wanted to simplify tasks that were repetitive and dangerous for humans by using robotics and automation. It aimed to improve productivity and efficiency in various industries through the use of collaborative robots.


Who wanted a strong government?

The Federalists wanted a strong central government.


Why New Brunswick should not have joined confederation?

They didn't want to join because the Canadian Government wanted a big cut of the natural resources of both provinces...


Who were Roosevelt's advisors?

One group wanted government-business cooperation. another wanted great government control. Another wanted to increase competition.


Why did the English want to colonize America?

The English wanted to colonize America because they wanted to take over the resources. By claiming this land they could have the rights to the resources.