0
Is functional structure the same thing as divisional structure?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
functional structure arises when people with similar occupational specialities come together to form formal groups. on the other hand, divisional structure separates the organisation based on their diverse occupational specialities in formal groups by certain characteristics such as similar product/services, customers, geographical locations etc
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Advantages and disadvantages of divisional organisational structure?
Divisional structure: Divide the organization according to the type of work, region, product and so on. Large organization may break down into Rail, water, road and building division. Divisional structure divides the employees based on the product/customer segment/geographical location. For example, each division is responsible for certain product and has its own resources such as finance, marketing, equipments, maintenance..etc. Advantages this structures allows for flexibility and quick response to environmental changes. It also enhances innovation and differentioan strategies. Disadvantages: This structure results in duplication of resources because, for example we need to have equipment , for each division. Obviously, it does not support the exchange of knowledge between people working in the same profession because part of them are working in one division and the others are working in other divisions Divisional structure:Divide the organization according to the type of work, region, product and so on. Large organization may break down into Rail, water, road and building division. Divisional structure divides the employees based on the product/customer segment/geographical location. For example, each division is responsible for certain product and has its own resources such as finance, marketing, equipments, maintenance..etc. Advantages this structures allows for flexibility and quick response to environmental changes. It also enhances innovation and differentioan strategies. Disadvantages: This structure results in duplication of resources because, for example we need to have equipment , for each division. Obviously, it does not support the exchange of knowledge between people working in the same profession because part of them are working in one division and the others are working in other divisions
The differences between a divisional organisation and matrix organisation?
Divisional organization allows employees to report to structure in which he's located whereas in matrix organization, the employee may report to more than one person .That is, having two or more supervisors at the same time. A matrix organization is situated in a single area and focuses on product and function whereas a divisional organization is located in different area and focusing on product, market and geographical areas. For example, UGANDA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY is located in Uganda, but many branches have been opened up.Such as Kampala Campus, Mbale Campus, Mukono Campus amon others.
Is an organizational chart the same with organization structure?
e
What are the differences between a project coordinator and a project expediter?
They're actually pretty similar. A project expediter is somebody who keeps track of status but has no decision-making authority on a project at all. A project coordinator is someone who does pretty much the same thing, but does get to make some of the minor decisions on the project without having to run them by the functional manager. Coordinators usually report to somebody who is pretty high up in the organization, while expediters are more like assistants to the functional manager. Both of them usually exist in weak-matrix or functional organizations
What is the word when a person managing project at the same time?
Do you mean doing management and managing the project at the same time? This is usually called a Functional Manager/Project Manager hybrid.
What is functional and matrix structure.under what condition matrix structure is most suitable?
the matrix structure :- a Grid of functional and divisional for two chains of command http://sameh.files.wordpress.com/2006/05/Organization%20Structure3.jpg Matrix structure, shown above, combines both structures. For example, we can have a functional structure and then assign a manager for each product. Some employees will have two managers: functional manager and product manager. This type of structure tries to get the benefits of functional structure and also of divisional structure; however, it is not easy to implement because of the dual authority. This structure is very useful for multinational companies. It is important to keep in mind that each managerial decision has its pros and cons. Sometimes, writers will convinve you that divisional or matrix structure are the recent trends and that you need to re engineer your structure tomorrow morning. Obviously, this is not true. Many organizations still has functional structure and is doing very well. It is very important to select the structure that best service your condition. What is your strategy? How many products do you have? What type of technology are you using? How big is your company/organization? Management should take necessary actions to decrease the disadvantages of the chosen structure and to enhance its the positive effects. For example, if we think the divisional structure is the best type for our condition then we should have tools to exchange knowledge between engineers working in different divisions. These tools can include forums on the LAN and conferences to exchange knowledge. Conversely, if we adopt functional structure, we can form teams from different functions to solve problems and develop our products. Developing countries suffer from the lack of research. Most of research on organization structure based on studying Japanes, American and European compoanies but it is rare to find a research based on a sample of African companies. That is a challenge for managers working in developing countries because the research does not really tell them what to do and what to expect. The differences in cultures can affect the results of adopting certain structure in certain part of the world. Sometimes, you deal with the same organization in different parts of the world and get very different standard of service. This shows that this multinational organization failed to reach the same results in the developing country. Management should not think they are going to double their profits because they adopted flat structure (less number of management layers). If this structure reengineering is not part of a certain strategy, it will not work. For example, if we adopt flat structure and then transfer the authorities of the middle management to the top management then we are increasing centralization and decreasing our flexibility. Similarly, if we adopt functional structure and allow for the duplication of resources, then we will get the disadvantages of the functional structure and will lose one of its main advantages which is economies of scale. Many companies have combination between functional, divisional and matrix structure. Many of the decentralized companies will have one or two department centralized such as human resources or marketing. Whatever structure you have, the results are the most important. The results are not your perception that you are the best. Measure yourself compared with similar companies. Do you need one week to take a decision that they make in one hour? Are your employees motivated more than those in other companies? Are you devloping new products and services faster than other companies? Are you achieving your main strategy?
What is the difference between a functional and matrix structure?
1.In the Functional Structure the employees have many superiors and they have to write report for all of them. On the other hand, in Project (Matrix) Structure the employees have to write one report direct to an administrator.In Matrix structure it is difficult to have two managers to manage same work but in Functional Structure have several managements. By( Mohammed Khalil).CBFS. Oman
Is it true that some aspect of functional structure appear in every organization?
As soon as there is more than one person involved, an organization will have a functional structure; each person will be doing something different. Since people doing the same or similar functions will want to cooperate, it makes sense to create a functional structure.
Does structure and shape mean the same thing?
yes kind of it is the same
What is the difference between positional isomerism and functional isomerism?
structural isomer explain the change in the arrangement of atoms around carbon atom even normal or iso-structure. But the functional isomer show the change in the functional group of compounds
What is the abbreviation of the word functional?
I was wondering the same thing. I decided on FCNL. If you start using it too, that will make it official!
What feature is the wing of a bat and the foreleg of an alligator A.anagolous B.homologous C.vestigal D. artificially selected?
vestigal structure because they are used for the same thing just look different.Answervestigal structure because they are used for the same thing just look different.
In the NFL playoffs why is it called Divisional Round when teams from same division can't play each other?
Only in MLB can the teams from the same division not play each other, and that's only in the first round of playoffs. In the NFL, I think it's called the Divisional round because in theory, only divisional champs will be remaining in the playoffs after Wildcard Weekend.
Do dogs have chins?
The 'mental protruberance', or chin, is a feature of human anatomy, a functional protrusion on our lower jawbones. It is not technically accurate to call this same spot a 'chin' on a non-human animal (with one exception - elephants), they do not have the same jaw structure. You can call it a chin and everyone will know what you mean, and there isn't really a good word to describe it otherwise. But it's just the curve of their mandible and not a functional structure like ours.
Do compounds of the same functional group have same physical properties?
Elements with same functional group have same chemical properties. They possess different physical properties.
A functional group changes the structure of a compound but does not alter its chemical properties?
I'm pretty sure it's false... if you change a group the compound has to change because its not the same anymore
What is chemoselectivity?
the reaction of one functional group in the presence of another same or different functional group
