Proactive means addressing trouble before it happens, whereas reactive means dealing with crises as they come. Proactive tends to be better since there will be less crises to deal with. You cannot prevent all crises, but you can reduce the chances of certain ones that are caused by poor planning.
Examples of proactive management include:
1. Thorough background checks as opposed to hiring anyone and regularly firing employees and/or having them arrested for theft.
2. Budgeting for equipment failure or having spare parts/equipment on hand as opposed to shutting down your production until you are able to get things repaired or replaced.
3. Thoroughly training your employees for even rare circumstances rather than "winging it" and exposing them to unknown situations with a risk that they will make the wrong decisions.
4. Budgeting for things such as tax hikes, unforeseen expenses, funding cuts, or whatever as opposed to figuring out how to handle such things when they suddenly occur.
5. Having a good PR team and attorneys on hand to monitor for certain types of problems before they become large ones. For instance, if there is defamation starting, good attorneys can head it off before it gets worse and the PR team can do their best to repair the damage.
Proactive action is self initiated behavior at work place, while reactive action in the response of the complaint/feedback
Put simply, a proactive policy involves making a sacrifice now for an uncertain future. It is doing something that can or would prevent a future problem. For example, saving money in a bank account. But being too proactive can be seen as paranoid. A reactive policy however, involves taking action after the problem has already risen. Just remember everything has costs and benefits.
Management is the process of cordinating organasational recourse together using the management functions which are planning, organising, leading.
Traditional management follows the style that has always been in place. Strategic management is tailored to suit the modern day's problems.
Quality Assurance (QA) focuses on preventing defects in the process of creating a product or service, while Quality Control (QC) involves identifying and fixing defects in the final product. QA is proactive and aims to improve processes, while QC is reactive and focuses on the end result. In quality management, QA and QC work together to ensure that products or services meet quality standards by implementing processes to prevent defects and identifying and correcting any issues that arise.
Proactive safety is seeing and preventing an event before it happens. Reactive management is waiting for the accident to happen, then make corrections
The difference between proactive and reactive has to do with when the action takes place. Proactive means a preventative action occurs to stop something from happening, reactive means something is done as a response to something that has happened.
Proactive purchasing is when you are for the product and reactive purchasing is when you react badly to the product. This is a consumer's way of thinking.
A proactive patrol is out on the streets, looking to see if anything is happening. A reactive patrol waits for something to be reported, and then goes straight to investigate it.
Proactive action is self initiated behavior at work place, while reactive action in the response of the complaint/feedback
The most significant way in which they differ is that Reactive investigations happen when the crime occurs and then the police responds, or reacts to the crime, while in Proactive investigations, the police gets involved in the crime before it happens. Reactive investigation reacts to the crime after it has been committed, and Proactive investigations acts before it is committed in a way to prevent it.
Put simply, a proactive policy involves making a sacrifice now for an uncertain future. It is doing something that can or would prevent a future problem. For example, saving money in a bank account. But being too proactive can be seen as paranoid. A reactive policy however, involves taking action after the problem has already risen. Just remember everything has costs and benefits.
Being reactive would be to blame your circumstances on what goes on around you vs. being proactive which is knowing and taking action on the belief that your future is decided based on your own life choices not on what goes on around you. A simple example would be if you were in a scenario where you want to buy a house but you don't have good enough credit. A reactive person would mope about it and blame all their problems on their circumstances and just decide that life is not fair and there's nothing to do about it. A proactive person would note the problem, and do everything in their power to fix it, whether that be getting an extra part time job in order to earn more, or paying off credit debt, or whatever needs to be done to fix the problem. And you can say that proactive is the person who is thinks before happening the event or reactive person is the person who wait for the things happened and then he take the action according to the situation.
Push is when information, data, or resources are sent out or made available without a request. Pull is when information, data, or resources are requested or retrieved when needed. Essentially, push is proactive while pull is reactive in nature.
They will run with different reactive power output, i.e. reactive load won't be equally shared between units.
# Reactive, meaning, "to trigger reaction" is used in the preparation of an organization for the unwelcome or the unexpected. Reactive Crisis Management is exercised by corporations after an incident that can damage their reputation of it occurs. PR plays a crucial role in such situations because it is the communication link between the company's management, employees, the media, government agencies, and legal entities; it is all done by the Public Relations Personnel. The performance of PR during such situations can mean the salvation or the demise of a corporation.
Consistent classroom management can be indicated by established routines and procedures that are consistently followed, clear expectations that are communicated and reinforced consistently, smooth transitions between activities, and proactive and positive reinforcement of desired behavior.