When you hold a share of a company, you are an investor in the company. You have invested your money in the company and it is the prime goal of the company's management to ensure that they earn sufficient revenue and profit for you "the investor" who has invested in the company.
Ideally speaking, shareholders can be considered as owners of the company and the managers can be considered as employees working for the company.
The relationship between project managers and line managers is that the project managers divide the work among the line managers and the line managers report to the project managers.
No. Their pay arrangement can give you a good indication as to how well they will act on the shareholders' behalf.
Stakeholders are customers, competitors, society, government, managers, workers, shareholders... These stakeholders have different objectives: Shareholders want more profits but managers want the business to expand so as to receive more salary and increase their status. In this case, if managers decide to expand the business, the shareholders will receive less dividend since the money is used for the expansion, thus there is a conflict.. Customers want a better quality of products and a cheaper price. Society wants businesses to use environmentally friendly materials. Workers want a secure job and maybe a high pay...
General Management is considered to be a high level stakeholder when it comes to Project Management. Project Managers might report directly to General Management, or to executive managers/program managers who then report back to General Management.
faak it
Linking managerial compensation to shareholder performance aligns the interests of managers with those of shareholders, as managers are incentivized to maximize the company's value. This reduces the agency problem by promoting accountability, as managers are rewarded for making decisions that benefit shareholders. Additionally, performance-based incentives can motivate managers to focus on long-term growth and profitability, further aligning their goals with those of the shareholders. Overall, this linkage fosters a cooperative relationship that mitigates conflicts of interest.
The relationship between project managers and line managers is that the project managers divide the work among the line managers and the line managers report to the project managers.
Shareholders are the people who invest from in the corporation by buying stock.
It is the relationship between shareholders equity and fixed interest debt.
Profit sharing, the more money the manager makes, the more the shareholders make.
1. Shareholders determine the membership of the board of directors by voting. 2. Contracts with management and arrangements for compensation can be made so that management has an incentive to pursue shareholders' goals. 3. Fear of a takeover gives managers an incentive to take actions that will maximize stock prices 4. Competition in the managerial labour market may force managers to perform in the best interest of shareholders. Firm willing to pay the most will lure good managers.
Managers can be encouraged to act in their shareholders best interest by linking their pay to the stock price. When they are motivated by compensation then they will do things to make the share price increase.
agency problem affects the financial manager relationship with the company by means of trust. if we are going to study the principal-agent relationship (principals=shareholders ; agent=managers,CEO,BOD), the agent will stand for and on behalf of the principal with the accompany of trust and confidence by the principals, but when agency problem occur where the agents are planning to pursue some objectives that are attractive to them while not beneficial for the principal the gap between the shareholders and the management team were created...
only boss and servent.
conflicts between a shareholders goals ana a managers goal may arise when the shareholder decides to by-pass the principle of agency theory which states that the mangers and shareholders should have equal rights of financial decision making unless one via the other is made to be clearly resolved through devastating financial effects. the conflict from here then oon arises.
i think that the CEO works for the shareholders.
No. Their pay arrangement can give you a good indication as to how well they will act on the shareholders' behalf.