0
Managers may prioritize their own job security, compensation, and personal career advancement over maximizing shareholder value, leading to potential conflicts of interest. They might pursue projects that enhance their prestige or short-term performance metrics instead of focusing on long-term profitability. Additionally, managers may prefer to retain earnings for company growth rather than distributing them as dividends, which can further diverge their interests from those of shareholders seeking immediate financial returns.
What else can I help you with?
Why might one expect managers to act in shareholders interests Give some reasons?
Managers are often expected to act in shareholders' interests because they are typically incentivized through compensation structures that include bonuses, stock options, and performance-based rewards tied to the company's financial performance. Additionally, shareholders have the power to hire and fire managers, creating accountability. Furthermore, aligning the interests of managers and shareholders can lead to long-term business success, enhancing the company's value and, consequently, the managers' personal wealth. Lastly, a strong corporate governance framework encourages managers to prioritize shareholder interests.
What is the cause of agency problem by managers?
The agency problem arises when there is a conflict of interest between managers (agents) and shareholders (principals). Managers may prioritize their own goals, such as job security, personal perks, or short-term profits, over the long-term interests of the shareholders. This misalignment can lead to decisions that do not maximize shareholder value, as managers might engage in risk-averse behavior or pursue projects that enhance their power rather than profitability. Effective governance mechanisms, such as performance-based incentives and oversight, are essential to mitigate these conflicts.
What goals might be pursed by managers instead of maximarazation of shareholders wealth?
Managers might pursue goals such as maximizing employee satisfaction, fostering sustainable business practices, or enhancing customer loyalty, which can contribute to long-term organizational success. They may also focus on personal career advancement, maintaining job security, or achieving operational efficiency. Additionally, managers might prioritize social responsibility and community engagement, believing that these efforts can indirectly benefit shareholders over time. Ultimately, these goals can reflect a broader view of success that extends beyond immediate financial returns.
Why do you think managers might demand error free documents?
give ma an answer please
Why do you think managers might demand error-free documents?
give ma an answer please
Why might one expect managers to act in shareholders interests Give some reasons?
Managers are often expected to act in shareholders' interests because they are typically incentivized through compensation structures that include bonuses, stock options, and performance-based rewards tied to the company's financial performance. Additionally, shareholders have the power to hire and fire managers, creating accountability. Furthermore, aligning the interests of managers and shareholders can lead to long-term business success, enhancing the company's value and, consequently, the managers' personal wealth. Lastly, a strong corporate governance framework encourages managers to prioritize shareholder interests.
What is the cause of agency problem by managers?
The agency problem arises when there is a conflict of interest between managers (agents) and shareholders (principals). Managers may prioritize their own goals, such as job security, personal perks, or short-term profits, over the long-term interests of the shareholders. This misalignment can lead to decisions that do not maximize shareholder value, as managers might engage in risk-averse behavior or pursue projects that enhance their power rather than profitability. Effective governance mechanisms, such as performance-based incentives and oversight, are essential to mitigate these conflicts.
What goals might be pursed by managers instead of maximarazation of shareholders wealth?
Managers might pursue goals such as maximizing employee satisfaction, fostering sustainable business practices, or enhancing customer loyalty, which can contribute to long-term organizational success. They may also focus on personal career advancement, maintaining job security, or achieving operational efficiency. Additionally, managers might prioritize social responsibility and community engagement, believing that these efforts can indirectly benefit shareholders over time. Ultimately, these goals can reflect a broader view of success that extends beyond immediate financial returns.
What two places might business find fiance?
Banks Shareholders
If shareholders are dissatisfied what action can they take?
The simplest thing shareholders can do is sell their shares. This is called voting with your feet or voting with your money. Shareholders can also petition to have items placed on the annual shareholder ballot. Shareholders can group together to vote out ineffective board members, though there are limits on how they can cooperate.
Does agency cost or agency problem interfere with shareholder wealth maximization?
Yes, agency costs and the agency problem can significantly interfere with shareholder wealth maximization. These issues arise when there is a conflict of interest between shareholders (the principals) and company executives or managers (the agents), leading to decisions that may prioritize personal benefits over shareholder value. For instance, managers might pursue projects that enhance their own job security or compensation rather than those that maximize shareholder returns. This misalignment can result in inefficiencies and reduced profitability, ultimately hindering the goal of maximizing shareholder wealth.
What factors might organisations consider when choosing between different sources of finance?
When considering financing, managers may consider the payback period and the interest rate. They will also consider how the debt will affect their cash flow.
How might a managers use the grapevine to their benefit?
Managers might use the grapevine to their benefit in order to find out about any employee dissatisfaction. They can also find out about potential problems that are occurring in areas of the company.
Why might the market value of a loan differ from its outstanding balance?
The balance of a loan depends on the original contract rate, whereas the market value of the loan depends on the current market interest rate.
Would socially responsible actions from a corporation make it more attractive to potential shareholders?
Sure it would Think of it this way. If the socially responsible actions that the corporation does effect the local community's views on it in a positive manner, then it would be likely that customers, suppliers and other stakeholders may have more of an interest in the business. Customers for example might want to buy from them, and suppliers might want to have a relationship with the corporation. From this prosperity going on, it's likely shareholders might want more shares to increase their profit, or new people just by shares. Hope that answered your question
Who might be the stakeholders of an internet banking system?
Customer Colleagues (or competitors) Community Shareholders Government Society
Is pursuing the interest of Porsche controlling families different from maximizing the returns to its public share owner?
Yes, pursuing the interests of Porsche's controlling families can differ from maximizing returns for public shareholders. The controlling families may prioritize long-term brand heritage, strategic investments, or specific business philosophies that align with their vision for the company, which might not always align with short-term profit maximization. In contrast, public shareholders typically focus on immediate financial returns and stock performance, potentially leading to conflicts in decision-making. Balancing these interests requires careful corporate governance and communication strategies.
