Would
If he were you he would not do it.
No, the modal "must" would not be correct, because this verb does not have a past tense form, as is required by the context of the sentence. Instead, the modal "should" can be used, or a passive form, "were required" or "were obliged" can be used.
does is not a modal verb
Examples of an appropriate modal verbs are:he can not do it;he could not do it;he must not do it;he should not do it;he will not do it;he would not do it.
No, "can" is a modal verb used to indicate possibility or ability in a sentence. It is not a preposition.
In functional grammar, a modal adjunct is an adverbial phrase that provides additional information about the modality of a sentence. It typically indicates the speaker's attitude towards the action or situation described in the sentence, such as possibility, necessity, or obligation. Modal adjuncts can include words like "perhaps," "certainly," "probably," "necessarily," and "undoubtedly."
The verb in the sentence is: will wiltThe main verb is 'wilt'.The modal auxiliary verb is 'will', which shows us the sentence is about the future.
it is very suitable that
can is modal auxiliary verb. In the above sentence it expresses ability. Can can also express possibility and permission.
The student had total admiration for his role modal.
would like to see = modal + verb + to + verb
Sure! In the sentence "She can whistle," "whistle" is the main verb and "can" is the helping (modal) verb.
Ought is a modal auxiliary verb. The "to" is part of an infinitive (to + base form of a verb). ought to go ought to have ought to see