This is unfair criticism. Your question lacks depth and meaning. It does not refer to the seminal work in this field by Clancy, Lippert or Smith and, as we all know from Foucault, "la boussole c'est dirigée au nord".
When faced with unfair criticism in a professional setting, it's important to stay calm and composed. Take a moment to assess the situation and consider if there is any validity to the criticism. If not, politely address the issue with the person giving the feedback and provide evidence to support your position. It's also helpful to seek advice from a mentor or supervisor on how to handle the situation professionally. Remember to focus on your work and continue to strive for excellence despite any unfair criticism.
It is unfair.
Unfair tactics were used in the game. The judge was unfair in the eyes of the contestant. "That's unfair!" he exclaimed.
you just did =) this is unfair treatment. that game is unfair
Yes, The ESPN bias toward the SEC is obvious. I also believe that the often unfair and undue criticism of the BigTen stems from the BigTen founding its own televsion network.
unfair
Unfair
Criticism of GATT includes concerns about its lack of enforcement mechanisms, its role in promoting unfair trade practices, its impact on developing countries, and its failure to adequately address environmental and labor standards in trade agreements. Critics argue that GATT primarily benefits wealthy nations and multinational corporations at the expense of smaller economies and workers.
Unfair Dealing was created in 2008.
Incorporating peer review criticism into the evaluation process of academic research papers can provide benefits such as improving the quality and credibility of the research, identifying errors or weaknesses, and offering valuable feedback for improvement. However, drawbacks may include potential bias from reviewers, delays in the publication process, and the possibility of harsh or unfair criticism impacting researchers' confidence.
Unfair is one word. An example sentence would be "cheating in the answerthon is unfair on honest contributors".
It was unfair because they had no evidence that they were guilty.