You can for the numeral IIII representing 4 but even that is normally written as IV, other than that generally no. 40 = XL, 400 = CD and 4000 = (IV)
A Roman numeral can be considered invalid due to several reasons. These include using a repetition of the same numeral more than three times in succession (e.g., IIII instead of IV), writing a numeral in a descending order (e.g., XCX instead of C), or using a numeral that is not part of the standard Roman numeral system (e.g., A instead of I).
Some Roman numeral clocks use IIII to represent 4, which is how most Romans would have written it. However, in order to comply with the rule that no numeral should be writen more than three times in succession the number 4 is now more correctly written as IV.
Generally the Roman numeral IV represents the number 4 but on some old watches and sun dials 4 is represented by the numeral IIII. The numeral IIII was correct when it was written but convention now decrees that a numeral should not be repeated more than three times. According to this rule IIII should no longer be used.
There isn't one. MMMCMXCIX is the largest Roman numeral because M may not repeat more than 3 times in succession. Thus values greater than 3999 cannot be represented by conventional Roman numerals. If we ignore the rule, 182 Ms would be the Roman numeral for 182,000.
Roman numerals do not have any symbol occurring consecutively more than three (or sometimes four) times. A number such as 54 000 would be written as the symbol LIV (the Roman numeral for 54) with a horizontal line over the top. The horizontal line indicates the number is multiplied by ten thousand.The remainder of the number would be written as 679 is normally written: DCLXXIX
A Roman numeral can be considered invalid due to several reasons. These include using a repetition of the same numeral more than three times in succession (e.g., IIII instead of IV), writing a numeral in a descending order (e.g., XCX instead of C), or using a numeral that is not part of the standard Roman numeral system (e.g., A instead of I).
The roman numeral for 4869 is (IV)DCCCLXIX. The Rules of Roman Numerals state that you cannot repeat a single numeral more than three times. So four would not be IIII. It's IV (5 - 1).
Some Roman numeral clocks use IIII to represent 4, which is how most Romans would have written it. However, in order to comply with the rule that no numeral should be writen more than three times in succession the number 4 is now more correctly written as IV.
Generally the Roman numeral IV represents the number 4 but on some old watches and sun dials 4 is represented by the numeral IIII. The numeral IIII was correct when it was written but convention now decrees that a numeral should not be repeated more than three times. According to this rule IIII should no longer be used.
There isn't one. MMMCMXCIX is the largest Roman numeral because M may not repeat more than 3 times in succession. Thus values greater than 3999 cannot be represented by conventional Roman numerals. If we ignore the rule, 182 Ms would be the Roman numeral for 182,000.
Roman numerals do not have any symbol occurring consecutively more than three (or sometimes four) times. A number such as 54 000 would be written as the symbol LIV (the Roman numeral for 54) with a horizontal line over the top. The horizontal line indicates the number is multiplied by ten thousand.The remainder of the number would be written as 679 is normally written: DCLXXIX
Roman numerals do not have any symbol occurring consecutively more than three (or sometimes four) times. A number such as 76 000 would be written as the symbol LXXVI (the Roman numeral for 76) with a horizontal line over the top. The horizontal line indicates the number is multiplied by ten thousand.
61,016 Ms followed by DCCCIV. However, the standard convention states M may not repeat more than 3 times in succession so MMMCMXCIX (3999) is the largest possible Roman numeral.
The roman numeral for 5 is V and 1 is I, since 6 is one more after 5 the roman numeral for 6 is VI.
Roman numerals do not have any symbol occurring consecutively more than three (or sometimes four) times. A number such as 56 000 would be written as the symbol LVI (the Roman numeral for 56) with a horizontal line over the top. The horizontal line indicates the number is multiplied by ten thousand.The remainder of the number would be written as 789 is normally written: DCCLXXXIV
I don't know. I've never seen a Roman numeral with more than one lesser numeral preceding a greater numeral, as in "...CCM...". If you remove one of the C's, MCMLXXVII is 1977.
86020 would be 86 Ms followed by XX. The accepted convention does not permit M to be repeated more 3 times in succession. MMMCMXCIX (3999) is therefore the largest valid Roman numeral.