These were two different Johns, attributed to two different books.
The gospel of JOHN 1 John, 2 John, 3 John Revelation
A:The consensus of biblical scholars is that the apostle John wrote neither the Gospel that now bears his name, nor Revelation. In any case, they say it is clear that the two books had completely different authors and now commonly use the name John of Patmos as the author of Revelation, to distinguish the two. At some point after the Church Fathers decided that the Gospel was probably written by the apostle John, they associated Revelation with him solely because its author also used the same name. Others, including even Origen and Eusebius doubted the authenticity of Revelation.
A Gospel of Judas Iscariot appears to have been in use among the Cainites, an early Gnostic sect. The Gospel was also mentioned by Irenaeus. However, it should be remembered that all the gospels, even those now in the Bible, were not really written by the disciples to whom they were attributed - so Judas Iscariot did not really write anything. One branch of Christianity came to dominate and was the branch that selected the gospels that it would include in its Bible. With the possible exception of John's Gospel, it did not include any Gnostic gospels.
The apostle Paul did not write the book of the Revelation.The apostle John, one of the original 12 disciples, wrote this book while exiled on the Isle of Patmos.AnswerThe island of Patmos is very close to the church of Ephesus which John pastored and to which he delivered Revelation after he wrote it. CLARIFICATION: there is no evidence that the apostle John wrote the Gospel of John. In fact there is plenty of evidence that ALL four Gospels of the Bible, Mathew, Mark, Luke and John were written by people not connected with the original 12 and who had never met Jesus.
A:Matthew, one of the twelve disciples, was credited in the second century with writing the gospel that now bears his name but was originally anonymous. However, modern scholars say that the gospel could not have been written by an eyewitness to the events described. One of the reasons for this is that it has been demonstrated by a parallel reading in the original Greek language that Matthew's Gospel was substantially based on that of Mark. An eyewitness would never have copied another account so closely. This means that Matthew did not write the gospel or any other book in the Bible.
The disciple John as an older man and Jesus in heaven (he would have told John what to write).
The gospel of JOHN 1 John, 2 John, 3 John Revelation
The book of Revelation, otherwise known as the Apocalypse, is the one which discusses the end of the world. The Gospel of John, written by the same author, deals with the life and teachings of Jesus Christ.
A:The consensus of biblical scholars is that the apostle John wrote neither the Gospel that now bears his name, nor Revelation. In any case, they say it is clear that the two books had completely different authors and now commonly use the name John of Patmos as the author of Revelation, to distinguish the two. At some point after the Church Fathers decided that the Gospel was probably written by the apostle John, they associated Revelation with him solely because its author also used the same name. Others, including even Origen and Eusebius doubted the authenticity of Revelation.
You can write it as that but it is better to write the full version.
He wrote the second, the Gospel of Mark.
No. According to many, the Gospel of John was written by the Apostle John.
Matthew has written only one book in the bible.
he used his Imagination.
No, Luke did not write other books in the Bible. Besides the Gospel of Luke, he is also believed to be the author of the Book of Acts. These two books are the only ones attributed to Luke in the New Testament.
13, I think...Another thought:Paul wrote 14 letters (books of the Bible), but I believe John only wrote 5 :The gospel of John, 1 John, 2 John, 3 John and Revelation.
Yes there are parables written in the book of the gospel of Mark.