The author's purpose is to show that Luke-Acts as a single two-part work has a dominant theme, namely, the universality of God's plan of salvation, regardless of ethnic origins or social status.
Acts is not one of the Synoptic Gospels - they are Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Acts can be considered a follow-on or sequel to Luke, since they were written to the same person and evidently by the same author. But Acts is not a Gospel.
I guess some people could consider the book of Acts as a 'sequel' to the book of Luke, in a sense, outlining the life and ministry of Jesus and continuing with the formation and ministry of his early followers. (compare: Luke 1:3 + Acts 1:1).
Luke's gospel (Luke 1:3) and Acts of the Apostles (Acts 1:1).
Yes the apostle Luke wrote the book of Acts.
Another Answer from our community:The Book of Acts is commonly attributed to Luke as a sequel to the Gospel of Luke. It reflects the history of the Apostles for the first 12 years after the Resurrection and then speaks primarily of Paul's works.The external evidence that Luke wrote Acts is early, strong, and widespread. The early church fathers Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, and Origen all agree on Luke's authorship of Acts. So do nearly all who follow them in church history, including such authorities as Eusebius and Jerome.The internal evidence in Acts itself that Luke wrote it is threefold. In the beginning of Acts, the writer specifically refers to an earlier work, also dedicated to Theophilus. Luk_1:1-4 shows that the Third Gospel is the account that is meant. The style, compassionate outlook, vocabulary, apologetic emphasis, and many small details tie the two works together.Another AnswerI am slightly confused as to the wording of the question. If you are asking who wrote the book of Acts, tradition states Luke, judging from the first four verses of Luke and the first three of Acts. This is just tradition, seeing that there is no actual page anywhere stating, "The Acts of the Apostles, by Jack the Ripper."
Acts is not one of the Synoptic Gospels - they are Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Acts can be considered a follow-on or sequel to Luke, since they were written to the same person and evidently by the same author. But Acts is not a Gospel.
I guess some people could consider the book of Acts as a 'sequel' to the book of Luke, in a sense, outlining the life and ministry of Jesus and continuing with the formation and ministry of his early followers. (compare: Luke 1:3 + Acts 1:1).
The Book of Acts, attributed as a sequel to Luke's Gospel, it considered the 'history book' of the early Church.
Luke
The book of Acts is often considered the second part of Luke
The Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles were written by Luke in the King James Version of the Bible.
The four New Testament gospels were all written anonymously and only attributed by the Church Fathers to the disciples whose names they now bear, later in the second century. The author of Luke's Gospel, although anonymous is usually called 'Luke' for convenience. This author also wrote Acts of the Apostles as a sequel to his Gospel.
The Acts of the Apostles. The Acts of the Apostles, abbreviation Acts, fifth book of the New Testament, a valuable history of the early Christian church. Acts was written in Greek, presumably by the Evangelist Luke, whose gospel concludes where Acts begins, namely, with Christ's Ascension into heaven.
Luke is credited with writing the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles.
In terms of word count, Luke, the author of both the Gospel of Luke and Acts, wrote about 27% of the NT.Word count Luke 19482+word count Acts 18451----------------------------------37933/ 138020 words in the NT-------------------------------.274 or about 27%
Luke's gospel (Luke 1:3) and Acts of the Apostles (Acts 1:1).
Yes the apostle Luke wrote the book of Acts.