answersLogoWhite

0

Because of changes made to the rules governing the Roman numeral system during the Middle Ages today we would convert the equivalent of the above numbers into Roman numerals as CDXC, CMXCIX, CDXCII and XIX respectively which makes them almost impossible to add up.

But there is evidence to support the fact that the Romans probably wrote out these numerals in a simplified format as XD, IM, XDII and IXX respectively because:-

XD = CCCCLXXXX because 500-10 = 490

IM = DCCCCLXXXXVIIII because 1000-1 = 999

XDII = CCCCLXXXXII because 502-10 = 492

IXX = XVIIII because 20-1 = 19

Hence the addition of 490, 999, 492 and 19 in Roman numerals would work out as:-

XD+IM = IXMD (1489)

IXMD+XDII = XXMMI (1981)

XXMMI+IXX = MM (2000)

Note that if instead you were to add up these numerals in an unsimplified format the answer would be the same.

Source of research and reference: "History of Mathematics" volume 2 by David Eugene Smith first published in 1925 and ISBN 0486 204 308

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

How would you calculate 1149 plus 19 in two different ways and 1149 minus 19 in two different ways but showing all work and answers using only Roman numerals with satisfactory explanations?

Save yourself the trouble and convert the numbers to arabic numbers (the numbers we usually use).


How would you add up the numbers of 19 49 99 and 499 using Roman numerals showing step by step details of your calculation?

Notwithstanding today's notation of Roman numerals the numbers of 19, 49, 99 and 499 would have probably been notated as IXX, IL, IC and ID respectively during the Roman era which makes addition straightforward as follows:- IXX+IL = IILXX (68) IILXX+IC = CLXVII (167) CLXVII+ID = DCLXVI (666) When writing out Roman numerals use the least amount of numerals whenever possible


How would you add up showing details of your work the four numbers of 168 199 1409 and 223 in Roman numerals?

When converted into Roman numerals the numbers of 168, 199, 1409 and 223 can be expressed as CLXVIII, CLXXXXVIIII, MCCCCVIIII and CCXXIII respectively which makes addition straightforward as follows:- CLXVIII+CLXXXXVIIII = CCCLXVII (367) CCCLXVII+MCCCCVIIII = MDCCLXXVI (1776) MDCCLXXVI+CCXXIII = MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII (1999) The Romans would have used an abacus counting device to add up the above numerals and probably simplified the equivalent of 1999 to IMM in written form.


A way to write numbers by showing the value of each digit?

expanded form


How are venn diagrams useful for showing relationships among numbers?

Venn diagrams helps us arrange numbers in odrder

Related Questions

Why is roman numerals used this day?

Because the Latin language is still used today and Roman numerals are in fact Latin numerals. Roman numerals are most often used to represent the year of a date in a more formal way, for example when they show the year in the end credits of a movie, or when showing ordinal numbers, like the third, fourth, fifth of something, etc.


How would you calculate 1149 plus 19 in two different ways and 1149 minus 19 in two different ways but showing all work and answers using only Roman numerals with satisfactory explanations?

Save yourself the trouble and convert the numbers to arabic numbers (the numbers we usually use).


How would you add up the numbers of 19 49 99 and 499 using Roman numerals showing step by step details of your calculation?

Notwithstanding today's notation of Roman numerals the numbers of 19, 49, 99 and 499 would have probably been notated as IXX, IL, IC and ID respectively during the Roman era which makes addition straightforward as follows:- IXX+IL = IILXX (68) IILXX+IC = CLXVII (167) CLXVII+ID = DCLXVI (666) When writing out Roman numerals use the least amount of numerals whenever possible


What is drawing showing relationships of numbers?

A graph


Do you have a diagram showing which way a tensioner fits on a Ford Transit van?

A diagram showing which way the tensioner pulley fits on your Ford transit van can be obtained from most Ford dealerships. The diagram can also be obtained from most auto-parts stores.


How would you add up showing details of your work the four numbers of 168 199 1409 and 223 in Roman numerals?

When converted into Roman numerals the numbers of 168, 199, 1409 and 223 can be expressed as CLXVIII, CLXXXXVIIII, MCCCCVIIII and CCXXIII respectively which makes addition straightforward as follows:- CLXVIII+CLXXXXVIIII = CCCLXVII (367) CCCLXVII+MCCCCVIIII = MDCCLXXVI (1776) MDCCLXXVI+CCXXIII = MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII (1999) The Romans would have used an abacus counting device to add up the above numerals and probably simplified the equivalent of 1999 to IMM in written form.


How do you know your calculator is working?

When it's showing numbers on the screen...


What are tick marks in math?

marks on a number line showing where the numbers are


Where can you find a graph showing World Cup spectator numbers?

100 million


A way to write numbers by showing the value of each digit?

expanded form


How do you add up 16 17 26 28 and 135 in Roman numerals showing your work?

The above equivalent numbers added up in Roman numerals are as follows:- XVI+XVII = XXXIII (16+17 = 33) XXXIII+XXVI = LVIIII (33+26 = 59) LVIIII+XXVIII = LXXXVII (59+28 = 87) LXXXVII+CXXXV = CCXXII (87+135 = 222) The Romans would have used an abacus counting device to add up these numerals which avoids writing them all out in full because when the numerals are keyed into the device by means of moveable beads it would come up with a final figure of CCXXII


What is 1066 plus 1999 using Roman numerals showing how you obtained your answer?

According to today's rules we would write out the equivalent of 1066 and 1999 into Roman numerals as MLXVI and MCMXCIX respectively and to add them together is quite difficult. But the Romans probably simplified MCMXCIX to IMM in the following manner:- M+CM = CMM (1000+900 = 1900) CMM+XC = XMM (1900+90 = 1990) XMM+IX = IMM (1990+9 = 1999) Therefore: MLXVI+IMM = MMMLXV (1066+1999 = 3065)