That would be "LXXI".
LXXI = 71
The roman numeral for 71 is: LXXI.
71 = LXXI = 50 + 10 + 10 + 1
you write 71 as LXXl and 20 as XX
It is an invalid Roman numeral therefore there is no equivalent Hindu-Arabic numeral but if you meant XX then it is 20 * * * * * Or, if you meant LXXI, then 71
LXXI = 71
As a Roman numeral 71 is equivalent to LXXI
The roman numeral for 71 is: LXXI.
The roman numeral for 71 is: LXXI.
71 = LXXI = 50 + 10 + 10 + 1
you write 71 as LXXl and 20 as XX
It is an invalid Roman numeral therefore there is no equivalent Hindu-Arabic numeral but if you meant XX then it is 20 * * * * * Or, if you meant LXXI, then 71
That is not an authentic Roman numeral. While the above answer is quite correct, that "LXXL" is not a true Roman Numeral, one might wish to consider a possible misreading of the number as you have transcribed it. "LXXL" is surprisingly commonly mistaken for what ought to be "LXXI," instead. If this proves the case, then the number would then be a true Roman Numeral, the one standing for "71" (seventy one).
"LXXI" is a Roman numeral representing the number 71. It is comprised of "L" for 50, "XX" for 20, and "I" for 1.
This is how you would write $50.71 on a check. Fifty dollars and 71/100.
LXXIXI is not a Roman numeral. the individual symbols are all Roman numerals but the order makes no sense. It is open to misinterpretation. LXX represents 70 and LXXI represents 71. However things get compicated because IX = 9 but XI = 11 so essentially you have a series of numerals which could represent 71 + 11 = 82, or it could represent 70 + 9 + 1 = 80. The symbol for 1 (I) would never preceed and follow an X inthe same numeral. The correct Roman numeral for 80 should be LXXX and 82 should be LXXXII neither of which are prone to any confusion.
The Roman numerals for 71 are "LXXI."