Well, that depends. :) If it really is a fact, then yes... but people sometimes think that things are facts and they really aren't, so people argue about things like that. In the past, people thought it was a fact that the world was flat... but then we found out it wasn't. Scientists, even now, argue over what things are fact and which aren't.
It depends on what the fact is.
no it is not always true
Tautologies are always true.
They always have the same numbers.
True means it is a proven fact; it is right or correct. False means it is not correct or not true.
A fact that is always observed to be true is described as a law. It represents a consistent relationship observed in nature or society that can be relied upon to predict outcomes.
not always is this fact true. It is however an old wives tale that cannot always be trusted.
C.Law
A true friend it always there for you, yet she accepts the fact you might have other friends. She is nice, honest and you feel like you can tell her anything.
No. It will always be true that you have lost your virginity, just as it will always be true that you have lost your milk teeth or learned to write. It's a historical fact and can't be undone.
This is not always the case, in fact, the opposite is usually true.
It depends on what the fact is.
no it is not always true
The Moon always shows the same side to us.
Yes. But the fact must be true for EVERY parallelogram.
an identity? maybe a tautology? Comment by mgately: In the field of discrete mathematics (simplified the study of logic) any expression which always evaluates to true is in fact called a tautology. While less cool sounding, an expression which always evaluates to false is just called a contradiction.
The term used to describe a fact that has always been observed to be true but could potentially not be true in the future is "empirical generalization." This concept acknowledges that while certain observations may consistently hold true based on current evidence, they remain subject to reevaluation as new data or circumstances emerge. Thus, empirical generalizations are not absolute truths but rather conclusions drawn from observed patterns.