Nothing, or more accurately, it breaks the usual conventions so it's impossible to say what the person who wrote it intended it to mean. You aren't allowed to have the same signifier on both sides.
Oh honey, xlxx in Roman numerals is just a fancy way of saying 40 plus 10 plus 10, which equals 60. So, in the grand scheme of things, xlxx is just LX, which is 60 in Roman numerals. Keep on slaying, darling!
trythgttrf
It is 60 because XLXX can be simplified to LX = 50+10 = 60
The Roman numerals "XXV" stand for the number 25.
Do you mean what do the Roman numerals XXVII stand for? If so then they stand for the number 27.
Oh honey, xlxx in Roman numerals is just a fancy way of saying 40 plus 10 plus 10, which equals 60. So, in the grand scheme of things, xlxx is just LX, which is 60 in Roman numerals. Keep on slaying, darling!
trythgttrf
XLXX in Roman numerals is equivalent to 50. In Roman numerals, X represents 10, L represents 50, and adding X after L (LX) represents 10 more, resulting in 60. However, subtracting X from L (XL) represents 10 less, resulting in 40. So, XLXX would be 50 (L) minus 10 (X), which equals 40.
It is 60 because XLXX can be simplified to LX = 50+10 = 60
The Roman numerals "XXV" stand for the number 25.
Do you mean what do the Roman numerals XXVII stand for? If so then they stand for the number 27.
They don't stand for anything because they are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
XL1 in roman numerals stand for 41.
In Roman numerals LXI is equivalent to 61
There is no K in Roman Numerals.
ML stands for 1050 in Roman numerals.
L is the number 50 in Roman Numerals.