VII
In todays modern notation of Roman numerals 1954 is MCMLIV but the ancient Romans would have expressed them quite differently
10-24-2012 is equivalent to X-XXIV-MMXII in todays modern notation of Roman numerals But the ancient Romans would have wrote out the equivalent of 24 as XXIIII
In todays modern notation of Roman numerals: 1995 = MCMXCV But the ancient Romans would have probably wrote them out quite differently
The Roman numerals are XLV.
MCMLXXXIX
If you mean in Roman numerals then in today's modern notation of Roman numerals it is now 3475 = MMMCDLXXV but the ancient Romans probably notated them quite differently.
In todays modern notation of Roman numerals 1954 is MCMLIV but the ancient Romans would have expressed them quite differently
10-24-2012 is equivalent to X-XXIV-MMXII in todays modern notation of Roman numerals But the ancient Romans would have wrote out the equivalent of 24 as XXIIII
In todays modern notation of Roman numerals: 1995 = MCMXCV But the ancient Romans would have probably wrote them out quite differently
18 in roman numerals looks like XVIII
The Roman numerals are XLV.
IVXLCDM No I didn't mistype that. I = 1 V = 5 X = 10 L = 50 C = 100 D = 500 M = 1000 The way you use them is a little bit complicated so I won't go into that, but basically, you string them to make numbers like XXV which is 25. The ordering also matters too, but like I said, I won't go into that here.
300 would be represented by 'CCC' in roman numerals.
MCMLXXXIX
DCLXVI
MCMLII
XXI