answersLogoWhite

0

In the modern usage of Roman numerals 1449 is now equivalent to MCDXLIX but the ancient Romans would have notated it as MCCCCXXXXVIIII

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is 1449 in Roman Numeral numbers?

1449 in Roman numerals is MCDXLIX.


Could you please show us how to add together 1449 and 550 using Roman numerals?

Convert from Roman numerals to Arabic numerals, add, convert back to Roman numerals.


How would you calculate 1776 plus 1449 and 1776 minus 1449 but showing both calculations worked out entirely in Roman numerals with explanations?

Today's modern way of expressing 1449 as Roman numerals is now MCDXLIX which prohibits sensible interaction with other numerals but the ancient Romans would have worked out the equivalent of 1449 on an abacus counting device as MCCCCXXXXVIIII and probably abridged it to ILMD thus facilitating the speed and ease of calculations as follows:-MDCCLXXVI+ILMD = MMMCCXXV => 1776+(1500-51) = 3225MDCCLXXVI-ILMD = CCCXXVII => 1776-(1500-51) = 327Note that the results would be exactly the same if we were to use the longer version of the equivalent of 1449.QED


What inspired the roman numerals?

Roman numerals were inspired by Etruscan numerals of which Roman numerals originated from.


How do you I write Roman number 11?

Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.


How do you write 522 in Roman?

In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.


What are the two methods of actually adding together 1449 and 551 using Roman numerals throughout both calculations?

In accordance with today's criteria 1449 converted into Roman numerals is considered to be MCDXLIX which makes it almost impossible for them to interact with other numerals in a logical progressive mathematical manner. But the Romans themselves would have worked out the equivalent of 1449 as MCCCCXXXXVIIII which can be contracted to ILMD thus facilitating the speed and ease of addition as follows:- ILMD+DLI = MM (1500-51)+(551) = 2000 Alternatively:- MCCCCXXXXVIIII+DLI = MM (1449+551 = 2000) Remember that: 5*I=V, 2*V=X, 5*X=L, 2*L=100, 5*100+D and 2*D=M Roman numerals: M=1000, D=500, C=100, L=50, X=10, V=5 and I=1 Contraction of Roman numerals can be found in the book 'History of Mathematics' volume 2 by David Eugene Smith first published in 1925 and ISBN 0486 204 308 For example LXXXVIIIIS (89.5) is contracted to SXC (100-10.5 = 89.5) QED


What is 113 in Roman numerals?

113 = CXIII in Roman numerals


What is 1830 in roman numerals?

It is: 1830 = MDCCCXXX in Roman numerals


What is 1697 in Roman numerals?

1697 in roman numerals is: MDXCVII.


How do you write 0 in Roman numerals?

There is no 0 in roman numerals.


What are two ways of adding 69 to 1449 and two ways of subtracting 69 from 1449 but working out all four calculations from start to finish in Roman numerals?

Nowadays we would convert 69 and 1449 into Roman numerals as LXIX and MCDXLIX respectively but according to historical sources the ancient Romans would have probably worked out the given calculations as in any of the following formats:- MCCCCXXXXVIIII+LXVIIII = MDXVIII => 1449+69 = 1518 ILMD+ILXX = MDXVIII => (-1-50+1500)+(-1+70) = 1518 MCCCCXXXXVIIII-LXVIIII = MCCCLXXX => 1449-69 = 1380 ILMD-ILXX = MCCCLXXX => (-1-50+1500)-(-1+70) = 1380 Note that in mathematics -(-1+70) becomes +1-70 and that for more complicated calculations the ancient Romans would have made usage of an abacus calculating device.