The Roman numerals for 7,8 and 9 are VII, VIII and IX.
8 or VIII 8 or VIII
In todays notation of Roman numerals: IX-VIII-MCMXCII But the ancient Romans probably wrote out 1992 simply as XMMII (2002-10)
MCMXCVIII (M for 1000, CM for 900, XC for 90, and VII for 8) Another contributor's answer: The above conversion of 1998 into Roman numerals is conventionally correct but VII in Roman numerals is 7 and VIII is 8.
XLII is 42 in Roman numerals. XXXIV is 34 in Roman numerals. The difference between them is 8, or VIII in Roman numerals.
The Roman numerals for 7,8 and 9 are VII, VIII and IX.
8 or VIII 8 or VIII
In todays notation of Roman numerals: IX-VIII-MCMXCII But the ancient Romans probably wrote out 1992 simply as XMMII (2002-10)
VIII-VII-MCMXCI
In today's notation: V-VIII-MCMXCI
MCMXCVIII (M for 1000, CM for 900, XC for 90, and VII for 8) Another contributor's answer: The above conversion of 1998 into Roman numerals is conventionally correct but VII in Roman numerals is 7 and VIII is 8.
XLII is 42 in Roman numerals. XXXIV is 34 in Roman numerals. The difference between them is 8, or VIII in Roman numerals.
8 8 1981 in Roman numerals is VIII VIII MDCCCCLXXXI or IIX IIX XXMMI. Note that 1981 is not MCMLXXXI in Roman numerals.
The Roman numerals for 5, 6, 7, and 8 are V, VI, VII, and VIII, respectively.
The date 8-14-2009 in Roman numerals would be VIII.XIV.MMIX
VIII XV MMVII in Roman Numerals.
If you mean 822 then the equivalent in Roman numerals is DCCCXXII