You know a linear relation is where 2 variables and dah dah dahd ah dah and you know i really dont know the answers to this cause im also looking for the answer to . SO ALL I CAN SAY IS KEEP LOOKING .
A linear relation is a straight line. A non-linear relation is not - it mayor may not be be a curve.
2.54 centimetres = 1 inch and tat is linear. There is no non-linear inch.
Yes.
To determine if a graph represents a linear function, a nonlinear function, or simply a relation, you should look at its shape. A linear function will produce a straight line, indicating a constant rate of change. If the graph curves or has varying slopes, it is a nonlinear function. If the graph does not represent a function at all (such as a vertical line), it is simply a relation.
I have recently been doing all these direct variation problems but not every linear relationship is a direct variation... But every direct variation is a linear relation!
Strength and direction of linear relation. Closer to 1 is positive linear association, closer to -1 is positive negative association and closer to 0 means no linear relation. Remember that 0 does not mean that there is no relation - just no linear relation.
A linear relation is a straight line. A non-linear relation is not - it mayor may not be be a curve.
Correlation has no effect on linear transformations.
2.54 centimetres = 1 inch and tat is linear. There is no non-linear inch.
A linear relation is an equation that can be written in the form y=mx+b and can be graphed whether it is positive or negative
Linear scales do not reveal the relation to the whole.
Yes.
It's an absolute measure (like a ruler), you are not comparing it, in relation to anything else. So linear.
because they have a proportional relation
The differences between the these two is that linear scale shows the relation between the map distance and the ground distance. The nonlinear scale do not show the relation between the map distance and the ground distance.
yes,according to relation coefficient of linear expansion depends upon original length.
The relation is an inverse one , but not in a linear way.