Q: What is the Roman Numeral For 0?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

No, the number 0 does not have a corresponding Roman numeral. Roman numerals were developed by the ancient Romans and do not include a representation for the concept of zero.

there is no roman number which is defined for the numeral zero . 0 is always written as 0 .

there is no zero in roman numerals

There is no Roman numeral for 0 because they didn't feel it was important.

Almost every number has a Roman Numeral exept that one number - 0. Zero cannot be represented by any Roman Numeral.

Related questions

No, the number 0 does not have a corresponding Roman numeral. Roman numerals were developed by the ancient Romans and do not include a representation for the concept of zero.

there is no roman number which is defined for the numeral zero . 0 is always written as 0 .

There is no Roman numeral zero.

there is no zero in roman numerals

The Roman numeral system is decimal but not directly positional and does not include a zero.

There is no Roman numeral for 0 because they didn't feel it was important.

Almost every number has a Roman Numeral exept that one number - 0. Zero cannot be represented by any Roman Numeral.

The modern way of notating 1967 as a Roman numeral is now MCMLXVII but the ancient Romans would have probably wrote out the equivalent of 1967 as MDCCCCLXVII

No, the Romans had no concept for zero. This is an Arabic notion.

The Hindu-Arabic numeral system which replaced the Roman numeral system.

The Roman numeral CCCL is 350.The Roman numeral CCCL is 350.The Roman numeral CCCL is 350.The Roman numeral CCCL is 350.The Roman numeral CCCL is 350.The Roman numeral CCCL is 350.The Roman numeral CCCL is 350.The Roman numeral CCCL is 350.The Roman numeral CCCL is 350.

the answer to what is the roman numeral for 101 is CI