I think the problem may be with interpreting. Many go wrong not because The Bible says one thing but they want another. It's been that problem from the very beginning we want what we are told is not good for us. We would like to feel we have the right to debate topics which we do not have the qualifications to discuss. To me a simple point is we wish to interpret what it is to take a life and end it but can we give it back? So why do we feel we have the right to discuss the question? Because we wish to impose our views or avoid some consequences for our actions. Therefore I'll interpret what something says to justify what I want instead of doing what is right. We will take land if it's for the greater good. Well what if the mall or building is run by incompetent people or the highway adds to pollution is that really for the greater good or just what some unqualified person thought at the time? So many things in the Bible do not need explaining yet people can't or won't follow them why jump to controversial items that we feel need interpreting. Let's start with the easy get those right then move on to the hard.
Catholic read the Bible literally and it applied to the church Magisterium and the The Cathechism of the Catholic church.They showed it to their actions and their faith.
It is Satan.The word 'devil' literally means 'slanderer'The word 'satan' literally means 'opposer'
AnswerWhen the Bible makes sense literally, it can be explained literally. Whenever it does not make sense literally, it can be explained allegorically, symbolically or spiritually. It depends on your interpretation of the Bible and how important you believe it is to project the Bible as an inerrant history.Many, for example, explain the creation stories symbolically. Others may explain the passage, where Jesus cursed the fig tree for not bearing fruit out of season, as being an allegory.
9000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 jk but i literally i dont know
there are three different ways of interpreting the bible .
John Brown's Self-Interpreting Bible was first published in 1778. It included notes and commentary to help readers better understand the text of the Bible.
Biblicism is interpreting the Bible in a literal way.
Mildred L. Larson has written: 'A manual for problem solving in Bible translation' -- subject(s): Bible, Handbooks, manuals, Translating 'Meaning-based translation' -- subject(s): Translating and interpreting
Literalists read the Bible by taking the text as written in a straightforward, factual manner without interpreting it symbolically or metaphorically. They believe in the literal truth and historical accuracy of the Bible and strive to understand and apply its teachings directly without much allegorical interpretation.
Yes, Joseph was a prophet in the Bible. He was known for interpreting dreams and his story is found in the Book of Genesis.
Interpreting the information
Interpreting the information
Puritans
Bibliomancy is the divination by interpreting a passage chosen at random from a book, especially the Bible.
£200
Earl P. McQuay has written: 'Keys to interpreting the Bible' -- subject(s): Bible, Hermeneutics
evangelical