It lacked a zero symbol which was not needed
If we are talking about xiii, it would be 13. If the last is an L, it's wrong.
It is CCCCXLVIII. James15511 The person up there is wrong the REAL ANSWER is CDXLVIII
A 5-letter word made up entirely of Roman numerals is "VIIII," which represents the number 9 in Roman numerals. In Roman numerals, "V" represents 5, and "I" represents 1. When "I" is placed after "V," it represents 4 (5-1=4), and when "I" is placed before "V," it represents 4 (5+1=6).
The Roman Numerals on a grandfather clock display IIII when they should display IV. The reason is that the original maker of the clock had incorrectly written the Roman Numerals.
The way the numerals are written is wrong. MCV = 1105, MVC= 1095 If that way was accepted the best answer I can give you is 905.
If we are talking about xiii, it would be 13. If the last is an L, it's wrong.
It is CCCCXLVIII. James15511 The person up there is wrong the REAL ANSWER is CDXLVIII
A 5-letter word made up entirely of Roman numerals is "VIIII," which represents the number 9 in Roman numerals. In Roman numerals, "V" represents 5, and "I" represents 1. When "I" is placed after "V," it represents 4 (5-1=4), and when "I" is placed before "V," it represents 4 (5+1=6).
The Roman Numerals on a grandfather clock display IIII when they should display IV. The reason is that the original maker of the clock had incorrectly written the Roman Numerals.
The way the numerals are written is wrong. MCV = 1105, MVC= 1095 If that way was accepted the best answer I can give you is 905.
Oh, isn't that a lovely Roman numeral? Let's see, MDCCCLXXIX translates to 1879 in regular numbers. Just imagine those numerals as little happy trees on your canvas, each one bringing a unique touch to the final masterpiece.
7000 is known as MMMMMMM in roman numerals; but according to the rule of roman numerals (like I said in the REAL roman numerals of 6000 and 4000) it is only supposed to go over three digits hence MMMMMMM breaks the rule. 7000- MMMTTT I'm not sure if that is quite right? If someone asks YOU what is 7000 in roman numerals; remember your roman numerals (like I said once again) but if you say 7000 is MMMMMMM in roman numerals, guess what. That answer is actually wrong and you're actually WRONG... VII represents 7 in roman numerals and sometimes VII with a line on top represents 7000, I am still not sure if MMMTTT is quite right.
6000 is known as MMMMMM in roman numerals but I don't want to sound different (once again); MMMMMM breaks the rule of roman numerals because roman numerals go over three digits.6000- MMMTTI don't know if that is quite right?If someone tells YOU what 6000 is in roman numerals; remember your roman numerals (once again) but if you say 6000 is MMMMMM in roman numerals, guess what... your actually WRONG... VI represents 6 and sometimes VI with a line on top represents 6000, I'm still not sure if MMMTT is quite right.Improved Answer:-It is: (VI) which means 1000*6 = 6000
There was nothing wrong with theGreekand Roman numbering systems. They were complicated. They have beenreplacedby the Arabic numeral system because it is much easier to use.
XCIX simply IC would be wrong http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Roman_numerals_-_XCIX_or_IC/id/4717682
The reason why they made it was because they wanted to make another way to communicate with people. (p.s, I might be wrong)
XIXIX in Roman numerals doesn't mean squat because it's not a valid Roman numeral representation. XIX is 19 in Roman numerals, but you can't repeat a numeral more than three times in a row, so XIXIX is just a jumbled mess. It's like trying to wear socks with sandals - it may seem like a good idea to some, but it's just wrong.