answersLogoWhite

0

Year 15 a.d.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the roman numeral of 399?

Today the equivalent of 399 as a Roman numeral is CCCXCIX but the ancient Romans would have notated the numeral quite differently.


What is the roman numeral of 3364?

Today we would write it out as: MMMCCCLXIV


What is Roman Numeral 54?

Under today's rules now governing the Roman numeral system the Roman numeral for 54 is LIV but the ancient Romans would have notated it as LIIII


How would you write 248 as a Roman numeral?

In today's notation of Roman numerals it is: CCXLVIII


What is the roman numeral for 946?

Under today's rules now governing the Roman numeral system 946 as a Roman numeral is CMXLVI but the ancient Romans would have notated it quite differently


How do you write 279 in roman numeral?

Today we would write it out as CCLXXIX


How would you write 275 as a Roman numeral?

VXXCCDImproved Answer:-In today's notation of Roman numerals it is: CCLXXV


What does MCD mean in roman?

Under today's rules now governing the Roman numeral system the Roman numeral of MCD is equivalent to 1400 but the ancient Roman s would have notated it as MCCCC


What is the roman numeral for 144?

In today's terms 144 converted into Roman numerals is CXLIV though the Romans themselves would have probably wrote it out as CXXXXIIII.


What is the Roman Numeral for 79?

In today's modern notation it is LXXIX but there is evidence to suggest that the Romans themselves would have wrote out 79 as LXXVIIII.


What is MXCII?

If you mean as in Roman numerals then under today's rules now governing the Roman numeral system the Roman numeral MXCII is equivalent to 1092 but the ancient Romans would have notated it as MLXXXXII


What is the Roman numeral succeeding mcmxlix?

Under the rules governing the Roman numeral system as we now know them today the Roman numeral of MCMXLIX (1949) is followed by the numeral MCML (1950) but the ancient Romans would have probably notated 1949 and 1950 as MDCCCCCXXXXVIIII and MDCCCCL respectively.