A logical argument is the most widely accepted form of argumentation. So, it's good to use a logical argument anytime you can. Logic comes in many forms, but is normally thought by western civilizations to have originated with the ancient Greeks. Aristotle is perhaps considered the most significant contributor to the forms of logic still in use, today. In its earlier forms, Aristotle, along with other Greek philosophers, used either inductive or deductive reasoning.
Inductive reasoning is thought to provide general conclusions from specific examples. For example, when you throw something in the air from the earth it will come back down. The same holds true if in one experiment you throw up a heavy object; in the second, a lightweight object. In either case the object will probably return to earth. The general conclusion is that, "what goes up will come down." You can do this over and over and the same thing will happen. But, further thought can cause this to appear as merely possible, not completely true. Suppose the lightweight object were a feather that was drawn higher into the air by an updraft and subsequently disintegrated in the turbine of a jet aircraft. So, inductively, only a probability can result from the specific examples, no matter how unlikely a different conclusion may seem.
Deductive reasoning, on the other hand, draws conclusions from definitions and axioms. Given two or more accepted definitions, which are accepted as valid by two or more observers, a logical conclusion can be drawn, if and only if there is no possible situation where both definitions are true and the conclusion false.
Simplified, logic is about making assumptions about truth, then trying to figure out if they are correct.
When it comes to Bible statistics and history, there are few solid numbers that can fit into the accepted framework of a logical argument. Numbers in The Bible were mostly symbolic. Although inductive reasoning can be applied, there still remains only a probability that the conclusion is accurate. Unless, of course, an agreement can be reached between two or more persons. In that case, a deductive conclusion can be reached, "by the mouth of two or three witnesses." So, any convincing, logical conclusions regarding Biblical issues must originate inductively, and then deductively conclude on the basis of the initially agreed upon premises.
A logical argument can be used anytime. But a logical conclusion is predicated on the commonality and the agreement of terms presented by the parties involved. To argue that faith is based upon evidence, when one party believes that it is, yet another does not, can only result in further disparity. If, however, both can accept the validity that it is, then a logical conclusion might be drawn that science is simply a another form of practicing faith. To disagree on the semantics is to prevent any logical discussion from reaching an agreeable conclusion.
While considering the universe, another example might be to inductively conclude that the earth was made for humans by some supreme entity. And the careful study of nature by certain agreeable parties may deductively conclude that the laws of nature don't really care about us; they just work. These same persons may further infer that the universe is not here for us; we just happen to have evolved in it. Logic fails a lot in religion, anti-religion and metaphysics. And science isn't perfect, either. But it is widely regarded as the best tool we have in trying to understand the universe.
Hope that helped *_*
A flow proof is a proof that uses arrows to show the flow of a logical argument.
A decision or argument based on sound reasoned argument which can be proved - logical.
He stated a logical argument. The logical thing to do is to hear her out. Sometimes people make emotional decisions that are not logical.
Flowchart proof
ar·gu·ment, A course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating truth or falsehood: log·i·cal Reasoning or capable of reasoning in a clear and consistent manner. logical argument- a course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating a truth or falsehood; the methodical process of logical reasoning; Thesaurus.By it's definition, it's to separate truth from falsehood or fiction.
we use it in sentences like the word 'because' or 'therefore' we use that in a logical argument
A ad-hominem argument is a logical facilities. This is when the audience are focus on he argument.
To verify the validity of a logical argument using a proof logic calculator, input the premises and conclusion of the argument into the calculator. The calculator will then use rules of logic to determine if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the calculator shows that the argument is valid, it means the conclusion is logically supported by the premises.
The backbone of a rhetorician's argument is the use of persuasive techniques such as ethos (credibility), pathos (emotions), and logos (logical reasoning) to convince the audience of their point of view. It involves structuring the argument in a compelling and logical manner to effectively persuade and influence the audience.
How is bias shown in an argument
They weaken an argument
A logical sequence in an argument is a way to prove a step has a logical consequence. Every proposition in an argument must be tested in this fashion to prove that every action has a reaction.
To show the logic of your argument in a persuasive piece, you should use the appeal of logos. This involves presenting rational evidence, facts, and logical reasoning to support your point of view. By using a logical appeal, you can convince your audience of the validity and soundness of your argument.
The thread of the argument refers to the logical progression and coherence of ideas presented within an argument. It should be clear and follow a logical structure, moving from one point to the next in a coherent and understandable manner. The presentation of the argument involves how the argument is communicated, including the use of evidence, examples, and persuasive language to support the main points and convince the audience of the validity of the argument.
A flow proof is a proof that uses arrows to show the flow of a logical argument.
A flow proof is a proof that uses arrows to show the flow of a logical argument.
If an argument has logical fallacies, it means that there are errors in reasoning that weaken the argument's validity. Logical fallacies can include flaws in how premises relate to the conclusion, irrelevant information, or faulty assumptions. Identifying and addressing these fallacies can strengthen the overall logic of the argument.