Psalms is a book of the Bible in its own right. The book is also quoted throughout other books of the Bible.
The Bible was written by many people, not found. The Bible as scriptures was not found whole. Ancient Jewish scrolls writings have been preserved as well as other historical events wich have been archeologicaly proven to be exact and correct. Later in ages the Bible was completed with the basic books you needed to reveal Christianity to humanity. Now if another script is found for example from the phrofet Natan, who did not write anything in the Bible, It will not be added, it would just be an anex to the Bible we know now but taken to be a true inspired scripture.
The Holy Scripture, Testament
There are 150 psalms in the standard bible, although there are a few others that are to be found in other sources from those times, but which, for one reason or another, dwere not included in scripture.
No, there could not be 77 missing books out of the Bible. Why not? Because the Bible says at 2 Tim. 3:16 that ALL scripture is inspired of God and beneficial. If God had wanted additional books put into the Bible; being the Almighty he could have done that, in fact he would have done that. But, he didn't. Wouldn't he have the power to do so if he wanted to? Of course he could have but the Bible cannon is complete with its 66 books. Please look at these other scriptures : Revelation 22:18,19. Proverbs 30:6. Deuteronomy 4:2.
Psalms is a book of the Bible in its own right. The book is also quoted throughout other books of the Bible.
Scripture
Of course! The church has a principle that often gets shunted off to the sidelines, but which is still relevant and appropriate: Let scripture interpret scripture. Other books can be used legitimately when they provide a focal point to get started in your Bible study. They can also give suggested places to go in your study to see the different nuances and perspectives that the Bible provides on different subjects.
The Catholic version of the Bible is called the "Douay-Rheims Bible." It differs from other versions because it includes additional books known as the deuterocanonical books, which are not found in Protestant versions of the Bible.
The Bible was written by many people, not found. The Bible as scriptures was not found whole. Ancient Jewish scrolls writings have been preserved as well as other historical events wich have been archeologicaly proven to be exact and correct. Later in ages the Bible was completed with the basic books you needed to reveal Christianity to humanity. Now if another script is found for example from the phrofet Natan, who did not write anything in the Bible, It will not be added, it would just be an anex to the Bible we know now but taken to be a true inspired scripture.
It depends on what you accept as the canon of Scripture. A typical Protestant canon does not include any mention of Judas Maccadaeus. Almost all of our information about this man comes from the books of the Maccabees (I believe it is split into 1st and 2nd Maccabees) and the writings of Josephus. It is a typical Protestant canon, the Apocrypha is not viewed as equal to the other works nor are they accepted as part of Scripture and so we do not find mention of him. If you want to read about him, find a Catholic Bible- or a study Bible with the inclusion of Apocryphal books.
The Holy Scripture, Testament
Ummm... Similar to what, exactly? There are different versions of the Bible, in the sense that several Christian groups (and a few non-Christian groups, such as Judaism) differ in what books they consider to be "canon", that is, what books are included in the Bible. Other religions (non-Christians) have their own Holy Scripture, but those are different books, and they are not called "Bible". You would have to make up your own mind as to how "similar" you consider them to be.
There are 150 psalms in the standard bible, although there are a few others that are to be found in other sources from those times, but which, for one reason or another, dwere not included in scripture.
the Jehovah witness have other books beside the bible but they all are based on the bible and interesting is that they all say look for it in a certain bible text. FURTHER While, for religious enlightenment Jehovah's witnesses study a number of books published by the Watchtower Society, only the bible is considered divinely inspired. Their bible study aids are merely tools to help them understand holy scripture more clearly.
No, there could not be 77 missing books out of the Bible. Why not? Because the Bible says at 2 Tim. 3:16 that ALL scripture is inspired of God and beneficial. If God had wanted additional books put into the Bible; being the Almighty he could have done that, in fact he would have done that. But, he didn't. Wouldn't he have the power to do so if he wanted to? Of course he could have but the Bible cannon is complete with its 66 books. Please look at these other scriptures : Revelation 22:18,19. Proverbs 30:6. Deuteronomy 4:2.
66 books