Many people feel that the New American Standard Bible (NASB) is the most accurate translation from the original Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic that is available in the English language, and is often noted for a lack of fluency when reading because the translators were so accurate to the original language that the sentences in English tend to be wordy. Despite this, it is widely used among Christians and is especially useful for serious Bible studies.
All Bibles fit somewhere on a continuum of literalness where the varying versions of The Bible are plotted onto a line. The NASB is always seen on the far extreme of literal translations. The NIV is somewhere in the middle, known for its meaning-driven approach to translation, capturing the essence of the language of the original text, while still making many minute alterations for improved readability and understandability. The Message is always shown on the far right as a completely consept-driven paraphrase.
It is important to note that there are not different Bibles(assuming the Judeo-Christian Bible is the Bible to which we are referring). Different translations do not yield different Bibles. Slightly different word choices do not produce different books. In the English language, there are many ways to express the same thought. For example, if John 3:16 says in one translation (NASB), "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son…," and in another translation (NIV) says, "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son…," without doubt, the same message is presented in both translations. The text is saying that God saw humanity's sin problem, but loved them so much that He gave His own Son's (and the Son willfully gave His) life to fix this problem. There are not doctrinal discrepancies as a result of minor translational differences.
So all translations say the same thing; the NASB is often felt to be the most accurate to the original language.
God is the true author of the Bible. He used men to pen the Bible
The bible is true you idiots!
Do not read the true Bible and allow yourself to be lord of your own life
The catholic bible has about seven books added to he bible.
The Bible wasn’t written to teach science or to be a school textbook, but what it says about scientific matters is always accurate. When the Bible talks about history, it is always accurate.The fact that so many Bible prophecies have already come true means that we can trust what the Bible says about the future. The Bible can change your life. It can help you to know who you really are. It can help you to understand your deepest thoughts and feelings. Truly the Word of God.
none of them are true. The Quran is the true book of god.
God is the true author of the Bible. He used men to pen the Bible
The Bible makes it clear that the true head of the Church is the Clergy.
There is no such statement in the Bible, the Bible says nothing about God's true name being lost.
course not. :D the bible is 100% true
None of the parts in the bible are wrong.
The bible is true you idiots!
The whole Bible is true.
The bible is true.
If the Bible is true then those who follow it can depend on paradise in the next life. If the Bible is not true, then their efforts, their faith and their commitment have all been in vain. Moreover the missionaries and preachers who spread out and seek to convert others are doing no one a favour. If the Bible is not true, then it is possible that the Hindu scriptures or some other holy books are true, or it is possible that atheism is the correct worldview. These are some of the reasons it does matter whether the Bible is true.
TRUE
The Holy Bible does not mention anything about that . . . in fact, in the Bible, God's true form is never revealed.