answersLogoWhite

0

Many people feel that the New American Standard Bible (NASB) is the most accurate translation from the original Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic that is available in the English language, and is often noted for a lack of fluency when reading because the translators were so accurate to the original language that the sentences in English tend to be wordy. Despite this, it is widely used among Christians and is especially useful for serious Bible studies.

All Bibles fit somewhere on a continuum of literalness where the varying versions of The Bible are plotted onto a line. The NASB is always seen on the far extreme of literal translations. The NIV is somewhere in the middle, known for its meaning-driven approach to translation, capturing the essence of the language of the original text, while still making many minute alterations for improved readability and understandability. The Message is always shown on the far right as a completely consept-driven paraphrase.

It is important to note that there are not different Bibles(assuming the Judeo-Christian Bible is the Bible to which we are referring). Different translations do not yield different Bibles. Slightly different word choices do not produce different books. In the English language, there are many ways to express the same thought. For example, if John 3:16 says in one translation (NASB), "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son…," and in another translation (NIV) says, "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son…," without doubt, the same message is presented in both translations. The text is saying that God saw humanity's sin problem, but loved them so much that He gave His own Son's (and the Son willfully gave His) life to fix this problem. There are not doctrinal discrepancies as a result of minor translational differences.

So all translations say the same thing; the NASB is often felt to be the most accurate to the original language.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the true Bible?

none of them are true. The Quran is the true book of god.


What bible makes what the true head of the church?

The Bible makes it clear that the true head of the Church is the Clergy.


Where in the Bible was Gods true name lost in the destruction of the temple?

There is no such statement in the Bible, the Bible says nothing about God's true name being lost.


Is The Bible a lie?

course not. :D the bible is 100% true


What part of the Bible is not true?

None of the parts in the bible are wrong.


What were the bad characteristics of Bible disciples?

The bible is true you idiots!


Is john 14 14 true?

The whole Bible is true.


Why does it matter whether the Bible is true?

If the Bible is true then those who follow it can depend on paradise in the next life. If the Bible is not true, then their efforts, their faith and their commitment have all been in vain. Moreover the missionaries and preachers who spread out and seek to convert others are doing no one a favour. If the Bible is not true, then it is possible that the Hindu scriptures or some other holy books are true, or it is possible that atheism is the correct worldview. These are some of the reasons it does matter whether the Bible is true.


Is the bible made up are all the facts real?

The bible is true.


Is it true that god is a woman and a man?

The Holy Bible does not mention anything about that . . . in fact, in the Bible, God's true form is never revealed.


What does good mean in the Bible?

TRUE


Why is the Doctrine of Inspiration important to a bible student?

A:If the Bible is merely the work of a number of men over the period of centuries that it took to write, there must always be doubts as to how much of it is true, or even whether it is true at all. The answer to this problem was to define the Bible as inspired by God, which, when understood literally, means that the Bible is infallibly true and without error.Because the Bible can easily be shown to be historically unreliable, many theologians prefer to consider the Bible spiritually true even if not always historically true. Of course, this undermines the very notion of the Bible as divinely inspired.