They are used in the Vatican City whereas Latin is the official spoken language and Roman numerals are the arithmetical aspect of the Latin language.
The Romans did not have the concept of zero-- there is no Roman numeral for zero. This lack made it virtually impossible to do arithmetic with Roman numerals and that is why we use Arabic numerals nowadays.
A guy before me said "Rome". Rome, which nowadays is just a city, does not use Roman numerals. The correct answer is "none".
MCXXVI CLXV is already in Roman Numerals. In the numbers we use nowadays: MCXXVI is 1126, and CLXV is 165.
It is already in Roman numerals and nowadays it is considered to be the equivalent of 119
Roman numerals were the number system of the ancient Romans. Hindu-Arabic numerals are the digits we use for composing numbers nowadays.
The Romans did not have the concept of zero-- there is no Roman numeral for zero. This lack made it virtually impossible to do arithmetic with Roman numerals and that is why we use Arabic numerals nowadays.
A guy before me said "Rome". Rome, which nowadays is just a city, does not use Roman numerals. The correct answer is "none".
MCXXVI CLXV is already in Roman Numerals. In the numbers we use nowadays: MCXXVI is 1126, and CLXV is 165.
It is already in Roman numerals and nowadays it is considered to be the equivalent of 119
Nowadays they are notated as DCCXXX and CMXLIII respectively into Roman numerals
Roman numerals were the number system of the ancient Romans. Hindu-Arabic numerals are the digits we use for composing numbers nowadays.
Nowadays it is: 952 = CMLII in Roman numerals
Nowadays it is: DLXIV
Nowadays 244 in Roman numerals are CCXLIV but the ancient Romans would have probably notated them as CCXXXXIIII
Nowadays: XXVII-II-MCMLXX
Nowadays the equivalent of 1968 in Roman numerals are MCMLXVIII but the ancient Romans would have notated them quite differently
Nowadays 599 in Roman numerals are DXCIX but the ancient Romans would have notated them quite differently.