A. She does not have fine jewelry
Mathilde borrows a necklace from Mme. Forestier because she feels dissatisfied with her modest lifestyle and yearns to appear wealthy and elegant. She wants to impress others at a high-society ball, believing that the necklace will enhance her beauty and social status. Her desire for validation and luxury drives her decision to borrow the necklace, setting the stage for the story's central conflict.
In Guy de Maupassant's short story "The Necklace," when Mathilde Loisel reveals to Madame Forestier that she lost the necklace she borrowed, Madame Forestier responds with shock and concern. She is surprised to learn that Mathilde and her husband have spent ten years repaying the debt for a replacement necklace. Ultimately, Madame Forestier reveals that the original necklace was a fake, made of paste, highlighting the tragic irony of Mathilde's sacrifices and the futility of her social aspirations.
Mme. Forestier responds to Mathilde's final revelation with shock and disbelief. She reveals that the diamond necklace Mathilde borrowed was, in fact, a fake, worth only a fraction of the debt Mathilde endured for years. This revelation underscores the themes of pride, vanity, and the harsh realities of life, highlighting how Mathilde's desire for a wealthier persona led to her downfall. It serves as a poignant twist that emphasizes the futility of her sacrifices.
She is no longer concerned about appearing rich and beautiful.
She is no longer concerned about appearing rich and beautiful.
Mathilde borrows a necklace from Mme. Forestier because she feels dissatisfied with her modest lifestyle and yearns to appear wealthy and elegant. She wants to impress others at a high-society ball, believing that the necklace will enhance her beauty and social status. Her desire for validation and luxury drives her decision to borrow the necklace, setting the stage for the story's central conflict.
MMe Forestier. It is a counterfeit wearing copy. She smugly does not inform social-climbing Mme Loisel ( la-zell it was pronounced when I had this in English) that it is a wearing copy. she loses it at the ball- exactly how is not stated- a phone call could have saved about sixty grand and a nose-dive into debt slavery and relative poverty.
In Guy de Maupassant's short story "The Necklace," when Mathilde Loisel reveals to Madame Forestier that she lost the necklace she borrowed, Madame Forestier responds with shock and concern. She is surprised to learn that Mathilde and her husband have spent ten years repaying the debt for a replacement necklace. Ultimately, Madame Forestier reveals that the original necklace was a fake, made of paste, highlighting the tragic irony of Mathilde's sacrifices and the futility of her social aspirations.
Mme Loisell, who borrows the thing from her (friend) Mme Forestier- which means Forester. Parks would not be a bad translation. In a sense MMe Forestier is the antagonist, though fatal pride- and maybe alcohol played a role. I think she ( Loisell) was drunk when she lost the necklace at the party.. and waited too long to report it... that would explain why she did not call up MMe Forestier when she first noticed the item ( which she believed to be worth 60 Grand plus) was missing.
Mme Loisell, who borrows the thing from her (friend) Mme Forestier- which means Forester. Parks would not be a bad translation. In a sense MMe Forestier is the antagonist, though fatal pride- and maybe alcohol played a role. I think she ( Loisell) was drunk when she lost the necklace at the party.. and waited too long to report it... that would explain why she did not call up MMe Forestier when she first noticed the item ( which she believed to be worth 60 Grand plus) was missing.
Mme. Forestier responds to Mathilde's final revelation with shock and disbelief. She reveals that the diamond necklace Mathilde borrowed was, in fact, a fake, worth only a fraction of the debt Mathilde endured for years. This revelation underscores the themes of pride, vanity, and the harsh realities of life, highlighting how Mathilde's desire for a wealthier persona led to her downfall. It serves as a poignant twist that emphasizes the futility of her sacrifices.
In Guy de Maupassant's short story, "The Necklace" (1884), it is Mme. Loisel, the one who borrowed and lost the necklace, who recognizes Mme. Forestier. This meeting sets up the twist ending.
She wants her to see what despair and trouble that necklace had cost her and want her to feel guilty but in the end she get a suprise #Sabrina
Madame Forestier said in a faintly waspish tone: You could have brought it back sooner! I might have needed it! Basically she was not happy with how long it took for Mme. Losiel to bring back a necklace.
Mr. and Mrs. Loisel, Mme Forestier ( owner of the necklace, who loans it out for Mme Loisel"s one night stand) miscellanous walk-on characters, people at the party, cab driver, etc. at no time did she have the common sense of calling up her friend and simply recounting everything that happened- which would have avoided much ( toil and trouble, not to mention money loss) The basic premise of a lost article figures in such social commentary tales as The Overcoat ( all of the money was Confederate), and watered down or turnabout plots, such as the (Super Car) a Detroit Dream car that figured in a plot in Bewitched and thanks to some Magic, was resolved happily- the car was returned to the Detroit custom shop where it was made, and the advertising executive ( who was driving the car when transmuted back to Detroit- seized on the idea of using it as an advertising prop ( he was selling sausages) it came out well, unlike the Necklace tale. listen folks- Observe and Heed article Nine from the Guy Upstairs....
Mme. Forestier's reaction when the necklace was returned was one of anger. She was not pleased that it took so long to get back because she may have needed to wear it sooner.
The main woman character is Madame Loisel. The minor woman character is Mme. Forestier.