A doctor may decide that there is "nothing which can be done" if the problems are too numerous and additional attempts to help may only cause additional harm. This would not be decided in isolation; a doctor would consult with other specialists before ever reaching this decision. Additionally, this would never be the final answer; the doctor would probably say "I can't help you, but here are the names of a few specialists who might be able to assist."
Doctors also (should) know their limitations. Sometimes, a problem, or a conglomeration of problems, is better left to specialists. Osteopaths (DOs) are doctors with specialized training to understand health issues within the framework of a systemic approach to health. A general practice doctor may refer a patient to a DO, or an internal medicine specialist, if a conglomeration of issues is better handled by one of them. I don't think I'd categorize that as a refusal to treat, however. It's a point at which a doctor knows that the best care for the patient can be achieved by someone more specialized.
Ultimately, a doctor will try to the best of his ability, to help. "First, do no harm" as the colloquial shortening of the beginning of the Hippocratic Oath is said.
No. A patient or responsible party must consent to the surgery. A doctor may stop treating you if you refuse his health care directions.
Thank the Dr. for providing the patient care and leave the room. Done.
Yes, a doctor can refuse to see a patient even if they have medical insurance, depending on the policies of their practice and the specific circumstances. This could occur if the doctor is not in-network with the patient's insurance provider or if the patient has a history of non-payment or missed appointments. However, if a doctor refuses to see a patient, they must generally provide appropriate referrals or emergency care as needed.
no they cant
Yes but if the patient is a patient of that doctor, the doctor would HAVE to refuse. Doctors, like everyone else, have a rite to a private life and can go out on dates. However, the rules (for the doctor) are that the the relationship between a doctor and that doctor's patient must be professional, because doctors are in a position to take advantage of their patients (who may be feeling vulnerable).
Yes, a doctor is not under an obligation to see someone. However, in an emergency situation, such as at a hospital, they cannot refuse to take action to preserve life.
A doctor has the right to refuse to accept a new patient except on the grounds of discrimination. After under a doctor's care, the doctor must provide care unless the doctor terminates the relationship with sufficient notice "long in advance". However, Under the EMTALA law, a doctor and/or hospital is obligated to get a patient evaluated and stabilized in a medical emergency situation.
If it is not your family doctor, then yes. Most of the time it depends on what is wrong with you. For instance if you go to the hospital with a broken bone, they can't refuse to treat you. They have to treat you because it's a relative emergency. If you go to a doctor who isn't your family doctor because you have a cold, then they could possibly refuse to treat you.
yes they can. It is a patients right and choice to refuse any drugs prescribed by a doctor. A doctor can technically, only advice the patient to take the medication. If the child is a minor than it is the adults choice.
Yes, a doctor is not under an obligation to see someone. However, in an emergency situation, such as at a hospital, they cannot refuse to take action to preserve life.
Sorry, but just because you WANT treatment does not mean that you NEED treatment. Lots of people want antibiotics for a cold, but a good doctor will refuse to give that to them. If you REALLY feel as though you NEED treatment for the problem that you are experiencing, you can always get a second opinion from another doctor.
Yes, a doctor can legally refuse to send medical records to another doctor if they have a valid reason, such as concerns about patient privacy or medical ethics. However, there are laws and regulations in place that govern the sharing of medical records, so the refusal must be justified.