Well, an arthroscopy is an invasive procedure. They actually look into whatever joint you need examined. On the other hand, an MRI is exactly that, an image or picture of the joint in question. So the option is totally yours...minor surgical procedure or...a picture, you pick.
When she tore her ACL, the doctor used an arthroscope to help him fix it.
An MRI with contrast means that a person who is getting the MRI will be given a dye or other medication which will show better what part the doctor is interested in.
ping pong
An arthroscope is a small surgical tool that allows orthopedic surgeons to visualize and treat the inside of a joint, such as the knee, shoulder, or hip. It consists of a tiny camera and light attached to a thin tube, enabling minimally invasive procedures with smaller incisions and faster recovery times.
No. Some doctors will order MRI with contrast to facilitate better imaging of some body structures. It is not absolutely necessary to have an IV for an MRI but if your doctor believes it is beneficial to have a the MRI with contrast then it best to consent and have the IV.
arthroscopy
it produces better images of soft tissues - apex
A CT Scan can image an aneurysm without a contrast injection even though it does better with a contrast agent. An MRI will require an contrast agent or an MRI/MRA.
The arthroscope is used in arthroscopy.
A bone scan, or x-ray is simply a different type of scan than an MRI. No kind of scan is better than another, it simply depends what the scan is trying to ascertain.
Your son would be better off investing his time and effort as a radiology technician because an mri technician is limiting himself. Most employerss want multitaskers and mri technicians can only do mris.
Currently in the profession world, being an MRI technician is not a good job to make more money. If you are a doctor though, who is also able to perform an MRI on patients, however, would be a better choice.