answersLogoWhite

0

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

BeauBeau
You're doing better than you think!
Chat with Beau
MaxineMaxine
I respect you enough to keep it real.
Chat with Maxine
SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: According to the Constitution which branch of government is responsible for readmitting states that have seceded from the Union?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Military History

How should countries involved in wars be held responsible for such environmental destruction?

People have different opinions about this. Some believe the country with the damage should be responsible, but others believe the countries causing the damage should be responsible. One thing most people agree on is that someone does need to be responsible for repairing environmental damage as much as it can be repaired. How they are held responsible and who is held responsible would vary according to the situation of the war.


According to democratic theory the primary means by which citizens control their government is by?

Voting in free elections


Why did the government clash with student protesters?

when an specific protest goes over the limit, the government has a duty to stablish order and so they will using all their might according to the amount of threat they have coming from the protesters.


Who declared war?

According to Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, Congress has the power to declare war. But the President is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.


What was the significance of the Dred Scott v Sandford case?

The Supreme Court decided to interpret the Constitution exactly as the Founding Fathers would have meant it. So when they said that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves in their definition of property. According to that reading of the Constitution, slavery was legal in every state of the Union, and the Missouri Compromise had been invalid all along. This verdict delighted the South as much as it offended Northern abolitionists, and it drove the two sides further apart than ever.