That is much debated topic. There are several websites that seem addresses this. There seems to be many individual cases where one black person did go with his master but he was mainly a servant. There are several documented cases where a Black man applied for benefits after the war but the local State would not recognize that he actually was in the service of the military. However there are several documented cases of blacks serving with Gen Nathan B. Forrest. This seems ironic in that many say Forrest founded the KKK after the war. Officially, the Confederate government decided in March 1865 to allow Blacks to serve. It is said that a regiment(or company) marched through Richmond to go to war before the city fell.
Yes, there were some. The orignal issue was more of the rights of each state over the rule of their territory. Slavery was certainly central to that issue in the south, but the basic belief in the south was that states rights were primary over federal rights. The north believed that all good things came from the federal government.
Both sides had troops that were black. A tour of the southern White House in Richmond is something everyone should do once.... Once is enough, but it is very enlightening.
Yes, Black Soldiers did fight in World War 1
Nearly all of the Black troops in the Civil War fought for the Union. Most were in Black regiments (often with all white officers) but some regiments had Black soldiers mixed in with whites. In the last few months of the war, militias around Richmond and Charleston forced Blacks to fight for the South but this was not a very smart or effective thing to do for pretty obvious reasons.
Yes, The southern military had many more officers to train soldiers. It allowed the south to fight harder and better than they otherwise should have.
a group of soldiers that stood in a square to fight?
Soldiers from North Vietnam, South Vietnam, Korea, Australia, and the United States were all effectively trained and prepared for battle in the Vietnam Conflict.
Yes, Black Soldiers did fight in World War 1
No Not at all
Union Soldiers were sent to enforce the right of black men to vote
The South West Pacific.
Mainly, the south. :)
Union Soldiers were sent to enforce the right of black men to vote
THey as much as the other white guy's did and ,ore because thay were black
1) The colored soldiers took more pay than the white soldiers. 2) They had shoes available for white soldiers but not to the black soldiers. 3) The black soldiers were told to do labor instead of fight like their white counterparts. 4) The black soldiers didn't have any special meals for holidays like the white counterparts.
No Buffalo Soldiers were Black Calvary soldiers who were sent west to fight the Indians. They received the name "Buffalo Soldiers" because their nappy hair resembled that of a buffalo's.
Nearly all of the Black troops in the Civil War fought for the Union. Most were in Black regiments (often with all white officers) but some regiments had Black soldiers mixed in with whites. In the last few months of the war, militias around Richmond and Charleston forced Blacks to fight for the South but this was not a very smart or effective thing to do for pretty obvious reasons.
You can only fight him at the PWT, south of Driftveil, as part of the the Champions Tournament.
the fight between the black and white